Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/123978
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuppen, Corinne-
dc.contributor.authorMercier, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorGrandgirard, Denis-
dc.contributor.authorLeib, Sthephen L.-
dc.contributor.authorEl Haj Hidalgo, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorMurillo Rubio, Óscar-
dc.contributor.authorDecosterd, Laurent-
dc.contributor.authorSendi, Parham-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-27T08:18:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-27T08:18:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/123978-
dc.description.abstractThe rate of invasive group B Streptococcus (GBS) infections is steadily increasing, particularly in older persons and in adults with diabetes and other comorbidities. This population includes persons with a foreign body (e.g., who have undergone arthroplasty). In a rat tissue cage model, we evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive gentamicin (GEN) administered systemically (5 mg/kg body weight) every 24 h, or locally (12.5 mg/L tissue cage concentration) every 24 or 72 h, in combination with penicillin (PEN) administered systemically (250,000 IU/kg body weight three times per day). The efficacy was evaluated on two different sessile forms of GBS: transition (i.e., in between planktonic and biofilm) and biofilm. After 3 days of treatment, the mean bacterial load reduction of transition-form GBS was greater in all PEN-GEN combination groups than in the PEN monotherapy group (P <= 0.03). The 6-day regimen decreased the bacterial load significantly in comparison to the 3-day regimen, irrespective of growth form and adjunctive GEN (P < 0.01). After 6 days of treatment, the mean reduction in transition-form GBS was greater with PEN plus GEN administered locally every 24 h than with PEN monotherapy (P = 0.03). These results were not confirmed with biofilm GBS. The difference in mean bacterial load reduction between all PEN-GEN and PEN monotherapy groups was <100 CFU/mL. Hence, synergy criteria were not fulfilled. Adjunctive systemic GEN consists of potential side effects and showed poor efficacy in this study. Combining systemic PEN and local GEN has a potential application in the treatment of streptococcal implant-associated infections.-
dc.format.extent8 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Sa-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00919-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers In Microbiology, 2018, Vol. 9, article 919-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00919-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Ruppen, Corinne et al., 2018-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationEstreptococs-
dc.subject.classificationPenicil·lina-
dc.subject.classificationBiofilms-
dc.subject.otherStreptococcus-
dc.subject.otherPenicillin-
dc.subject.otherBiofilms-
dc.titleIs Penicillin Plus Gentamicin Synergistic Against Sessile Group B Streptococcal Isolates? An In Vivo Study With An Experimental Model Of Foreign-body Infection-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec698958-
dc.date.updated2018-07-24T11:40:20Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid29867830-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RuppenC.pdf3.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons