Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/126839
Title: Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women
Author: Azagra Ledesma, Rafael
Zwart, Marta
Encabo, Gloria
Aguyé, Amada
Martín Sánchez, Juan Carlos
Puchol, Núria
Gabriel Escoda, Paula
Ortiz Alinque, Sergio
Gené, Emilio
Iglesias, Milagros
Moriña, David
Diaz Herrera, Miguel Angel
Utzet, Mireia
Manresa Domínguez, Josep Maria
GROIMAP study group
Keywords: Osteoporosi
Fractures
Osteoporosis
Issue Date: 17-Jun-2016
Publisher: BioMed Central
Abstract: Background: The FRAX (R) tool estimates the risk of a fragility fracture among the population and many countries have been evaluating its performance among their populations since its creation in 2007. The purpose of this study is to update the first FRIDEX cohort analysis comparing FRAX with the bone mineral density (BMD) model, and its predictive abilities. Methods: The discriminatory ability of the FRAX was assessed using the ` area under curve' of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC). Predictive ability was assessed by comparing estimated risk fractures with incidence fractures after a 10-year follow up period. Results: One thousand three hundred eight women >= 40 and >= 90 years followed up during a 10-year period. The AUC for major osteoporotic fractures using FRAX without DXA was 0.686 (95 % CI 0.630-0.742) and using FN T-score of DXA 0.714 (95 % CI 0.661-0.767). Using only the traditional parameters of DXA (FN T-score), the AUC was 0.706 (95 % CI 0.652-0.760). The AUC for hip osteoporotic fracture was 0.883 (95 % CI 0.827-0.938), 0.857 (95 % CI 0. 773-0.941), and 0.814 (95 % CI 0.712-0.916) respectively. For major osteoporotic fractures, the overall predictive value using the ratio Observed fractures/Expected fractures calculated with FRAX without T-score of DXA was 2.29 and for hip fractures 2.28 and with the inclusion of the T-score 2.01 and 1.83 respectively. However, for hip fracture in women < 65 years was 1.53 and 1.24 respectively. Conclusions: The FRAX tool has been found to show a good discriminatory capacity for detecting women at high risk of fragility fracture, and is better for hip fracture than major fracture. The test of sensibility shows that it is, at least, not inferior than when using BMD model alone. The predictive capacity of FRAX tool needs some adjustment. This capacity is better for hip fracture prediction and better for women < 65 years. Further studies in Catalonia and other regions of Spain are needed to fine tune the FRAX tool's predictive capability.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6
It is part of: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016, vol. 17, num. 262
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/126839
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AzagraR.pdf842.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons