Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/128323
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Victor S.-
dc.contributor.authorGoletti, Delia-
dc.contributor.authorKontogianni, Konstantina-
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Emily R.-
dc.contributor.authorMolina Moya, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Benítez, José-
dc.contributor.authorCrudu, Valeriu-
dc.contributor.authorMartins-Filho, Paulo R.S.-
dc.contributor.authorRuhwald, Morten-
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Lovett-
dc.contributor.authorBimba, John S.-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Basteiro, Alberto L.-
dc.contributor.authorPetrone, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorKabeer, Basir S.-
dc.contributor.authorReither, Klaus-
dc.contributor.authorCuevas, Luis E.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-15T13:39:56Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-15T13:39:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-
dc.identifier.issn1198-743X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/128323-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We examined the data reported in studies for diagnostic purposes and to discuss whether their intended use could be extended to triage, as rule-in or rule-out tests to select individuals who should undergo further confirmatory tests. Methods: We searched Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science with the terms ‘acute phase proteins,’ ‘IP-10,’ ‘tuberculosis,’ ‘screening’ and ‘diagnosis,’ extracted the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers and explored methodologic differences to explain performance variations. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects models for overall pooled accuracy. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model was used for meta-analysis. Results: We identified 14, four and one studies for C-reactive protein (CRP), interferon γ–induced protein 10 (IP-10) and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP). The pooled CRP sensitivity/specificity (95% confidence interval) was 89% (80–96) and 57% (36–65). Sensitivity/specificity were higher in high-tuberculosis-burden countries (90%/64%), HIV-infected individuals (91%/61%) and community-based studies (90%/62%). IP-10 sensitivity/specificity in TB vs. non-TB studies was 85%/63% and in TB and HIV coinfected vs. other lung conditions 94%/21%. However, IP-10 studies included diverse populations and a high risk of bias, resulting in very low-quality evidence. AGP had 86%/93% sensitivity/specificity. Conclusions: Few studies have evaluated CRP, IP-10 and AGP for the triage of symptomatic patients. Their high sensitivity and moderate specificity warrant further prospective studies exploring whether their combined use could optimize performance.-
dc.format.extent32 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.017-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2019, vol. 25, num. 2, p. 169–177-
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.017-
dc.rightscc by-nc-nd (c) Santos et al., 2019-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)-
dc.subject.classificationTuberculosi-
dc.subject.classificationDiagnòstic-
dc.subject.otherTuberculosis-
dc.subject.otherDiagnosis-
dc.titleAcute phase proteins and IP-10 as triage tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.date.updated2019-02-14T15:17:58Z-
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/643381/EU//TBVAC2020-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Santos_VS_Clin_Microbiol_Infect_2018.pdf1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons