Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/130961
Title: | Diet of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the Gulf of Cadiz: Insights from stomach content and stable isotope analyses |
Author: | Giménez, Joan Marçalo, Ana Ramírez Benítez, Francisco José Verborgh, Philippe Gauffier, Pauline Esteban, Ruth Nicolau, Lídia González Ortegón, Enrique Baldó, Francisco Vilas, César Vingada, JOsé Forero, Manuela G. Stephanis, Renaud de |
Keywords: | Dofins Ecologia marina Cadis (Andalusia) Isòtops estables en ecologia Dolphins Marine ecology Cádiz (Andalusia) Stable isotopes in ecological research |
Issue Date: | 12-Dec-2017 |
Publisher: | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Abstract: | The ecological role of species can vary among populations depending on local and regional differences in diet. This is particularly true for top predators such as the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), which exhibits a highly varied diet throughout its distribution range. Local dietary assessments are therefore critical to fully understand the role of this species within marine ecosystems, as well as its interaction with important ecosystem services such as fisheries. Here, we combined stomach content analyses (SCA) and stable isotope analyses (SIA) to describe bottlenose dolphins diet in the Gulf of Cadiz (North Atlantic Ocean). Prey items identified using SCA included European conger (Conger conger) and European hake (Merluccius merluccius) as the most important ingested prey. However, mass-balance isotopic mixing model (MixSIAR), using δ13C and δ15N, indicated that the assimilated diet consisted mainly on Sparidae species (e.g. seabream, Diplodus annularis and D. bellottii, rubberlip grunt, Plectorhinchus mediterraneus, and common pandora, Pagellus erythrinus) and a mixture of other species including European hake, mackerels (Scomber colias, S. japonicus and S. scombrus), European conger, red bandfish (Cepola macrophthalma) and European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus). These contrasting results highlight differences in the temporal and taxonomic resolution of each approach, but also point to potential differences between ingested (SCA) and assimilated (SIA) diets. Both approaches provide different insights, e.g. determination of consumed fish biomass for the management of fish stocks (SCA) or identification of important assimilated prey species to the consumer (SIA). |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184673 |
It is part of: | PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, num. 9, p. e0184673 |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/130961 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184673 |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
681758.pdf | 1.65 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License