Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/150561
Title: | FAIR Principles: Interpretations and Implementation Considerations |
Author: | Jacobsen, Annika Miranda Azevedo, Ricardo de Juty, Nick Batista, Dominique Coles, Simon J. Cornet, Ronald Courtot, Mélanie Crosas, Mercè Dumontier, Michel Evelo Chris, T. Goble, Carole Guizzardi, Giancarlo Kryger-Hansen, Karsten Hasnain, Ali Hettne, Kristina Heringa, Jaap Hooft, Rob W. W. Imming, Melanie Jeffery, Keith G. Kaliyaperumal, Rajaram Kersloot, Martijn G. Kirkpatrick, Christine R. Kuhn, Tobias Labastida i Juan, Ignasi, 1970- Magagna, Barbara McQuilton, Peter Meyers, Natalie Montesanti, Annalisa van-Reisen, Mirjam Rocca-Serra, Philippe Pergl, Robert Sansone, Susanna-Assunta Bonino da Silva Santos, Luiz Olavo Schneider, Juliane Strawn, George Thompson, Mark Waagmeester, Andra Weigel, Tobias Wilkinson, Mark D. Willighagen, Egon |
Keywords: | Recerca Accés obert Dades de recerca Research Open access publishing Research data |
Issue Date: | 31-Jan-2020 |
Publisher: | The MIT Press |
Abstract: | The FAIR principles have been widely cited, endorsed and adopted by a broad range of stakeholders since their publication in 2016. By intention, the 15 FAIR guiding principles do not dictate specific technological implementations, but provide guidance for improving Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of digital resources. This has likely contributed to the broad adoption of the FAIR principles, because individual stakeholder communities can implement their own FAIR solutions. However, it has also resulted in inconsistent interpretations that carry the risk of leading to incompatible implementations. Thus, while the FAIR principles are formulated on a high level and may be interpreted and implemented in different ways, for true interoperability we need to support convergence in implementation choices that are widely accessible and (re)-usable. We introduce the concept of FAIR implementation considerations to assist accelerated global participation and convergence towards accessible, robust, widespread and consistent FAIR implementations. Any self-identified stakeholder community may either choose to reuse solutions from existing implementations, or when they spot a gap, accept the challenge to create the needed solution, which, ideally, can be used again by other communities in the future. Here, we provide interpretations and implementation considerations (choices and challenges) for each FAIR principle. |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024 |
It is part of: | Data Intelligence, 2020, vol. 2, num. 1, p. 10-29 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2445/150561 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024 |
ISSN: | 2096-7004 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (CRAI-UB) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
693187.pdf | 315.53 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License