Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Multidimensional instruments with an integral approach to identify Frailty in community-dwelling people: protocol for a systematic psychometric review
Author: Zamora-Sánchez, Juan José
Gea-Caballero, Vicente
Julián-Rochina, Iván
Jódar-Fernández, Lina
Lumillo Gutiérrez, Iris
Sastre Rus, Meritxell
Urpí Fernández, Ana María
Zabaleta-del-Olmo, Edurne
Keywords: Habitatges
Atenció primària
Ressenyes sistemàtiques (Investigació mèdica)
Primary health care
Medical screening
Systematic reviews (Medical research)
Issue Date: 15-Dec-2019
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Abstract: Introduction: an increasing number of investigations highlight the complex nature of frailty; therefore, the use of multidimensional assessment instruments could be useful in clinical decision-making. Frail people are found mainly in the community setting which is why this is the ideal environment for early screening and intervention. For this purpose, it is necessary to have valid, time-effective and easy-to-use frailty assessment instruments. The aim of this review is to critically appraise, compare and summarise the quality of the measurement properties of all multidimensional instruments with an integral approach to identify frailty in community-dwelling people. Methods and analysis: Medline, Psychological Information Database (PsycINFO) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) will be searched from their inception dates. We will also conduct searches in databases of grey literature. No limits will be applied for language. A highly sensitive validated search filter will be used for finding studies on measurement properties. An additional search including the names of the instruments found in the initial search will also be undertaken. Studies aiming at the development of a measurement instrument, the evaluation of one or more measurement properties or the evaluation of its interpretability will be included. The instrument should have an integral approach (physical, psychological and social) and it should measure all three domains. The context of use should be a community setting. Two reviewers independently will screen the references and assess the risk of bias by consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments checklist. To assess the overall evidence for the measurement properties of the identified instruments, the results of the different studies, adjusted for their methodological quality, will be combined. Ethics and dissemination: ethical approval and patient consent are not required as this is a psychometric review based on published studies. The results of this review will be disseminated at conferences and published in an international peer-reviewed journal.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a:
It is part of: BMJ Open, 2019, vol. 9, num. 12, p. e033160
Related resource:
ISSN: 2044-6055
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Infermeria de Salut Pública, Salut mental i Maternoinfantil)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
697000.pdf293.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons