Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/154079
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPreciado, M.-
dc.contributor.authorAnguera Argilaga, María Teresa-
dc.contributor.authorOlarte, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLapresa, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T13:04:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-26T13:04:50Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-26-
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/154079-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This systematic mixed study review, focuses on the use of observation methodology in elite men's football matches, which constitutes an innovative approach, that opens up a new panorama of useful and productive research. Method: The methods used in this study follow the recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines (PRISMA). The search was carried out in five databases. Ninety-four articles out of 3,195 were selected and analyzed. In order to achieve a quality assessment, the guide was used to inform evaluations based on observation methodology (GREOM) (Portell et al., 2015), recognized by the EQUATOR network. Results: From the methodological review analysis, information obtained indicates that 97% of the researches used direct observation and 3% indirect observation. On the other hand, 56.5% of the articles explain the instrument used and 77% justify the applied observational design. A quantitative comparison of the proportions was made in several methodological aspects, which resulted in only 15.21% reviewing the quality of the data, and that 67.3% of the articles contributed to the mixed methods approach. The methodological review allowed us to establish procedural profiles. The results indicate that 67% of the articles have been published in English, and of these, 77% were published in journals that have an impact factor. The majority of the researchers, 53.26%, belong to Spanish entities. The most studied substantive aspects were goal (34%), possession of the ball (28%), and corner (27%). The most observed events were Leagues, World Cups, individual players and other events. Conclusions: The results obtained refer to both substantive and methodological aspects and allow us to configure a systematic review of mixed studies, in which we emphasize the aspects of a "systematic review" and a "mixed study," within an integrated perspective.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02077-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, p. 2077-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02077-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Preciado, M. et al., 2019-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)-
dc.subject.classificationObservació (Mètode científic)-
dc.subject.classificationFutbol-
dc.subject.otherObservation (Scientific method)-
dc.subject.otherSoccer-
dc.titleObservational Studies in Male Elite Football: A Systematic Mixed Study Review-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec692942-
dc.date.updated2020-03-26T13:04:51Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid31681054-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
692942.pdf1.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons