Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/154079
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Preciado, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Anguera Argilaga, María Teresa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Olarte, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lapresa, Daniel | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T13:04:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T13:04:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-26 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2445/154079 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This systematic mixed study review, focuses on the use of observation methodology in elite men's football matches, which constitutes an innovative approach, that opens up a new panorama of useful and productive research. Method: The methods used in this study follow the recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines (PRISMA). The search was carried out in five databases. Ninety-four articles out of 3,195 were selected and analyzed. In order to achieve a quality assessment, the guide was used to inform evaluations based on observation methodology (GREOM) (Portell et al., 2015), recognized by the EQUATOR network. Results: From the methodological review analysis, information obtained indicates that 97% of the researches used direct observation and 3% indirect observation. On the other hand, 56.5% of the articles explain the instrument used and 77% justify the applied observational design. A quantitative comparison of the proportions was made in several methodological aspects, which resulted in only 15.21% reviewing the quality of the data, and that 67.3% of the articles contributed to the mixed methods approach. The methodological review allowed us to establish procedural profiles. The results indicate that 67% of the articles have been published in English, and of these, 77% were published in journals that have an impact factor. The majority of the researchers, 53.26%, belong to Spanish entities. The most studied substantive aspects were goal (34%), possession of the ball (28%), and corner (27%). The most observed events were Leagues, World Cups, individual players and other events. Conclusions: The results obtained refer to both substantive and methodological aspects and allow us to configure a systematic review of mixed studies, in which we emphasize the aspects of a "systematic review" and a "mixed study," within an integrated perspective. | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | - |
dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02077 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, p. 2077 | - |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02077 | - |
dc.rights | cc-by (c) Preciado, M. et al., 2019 | - |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es | - |
dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa) | - |
dc.subject.classification | Observació (Mètode científic) | - |
dc.subject.classification | Futbol | - |
dc.subject.other | Observation (Scientific method) | - |
dc.subject.other | Soccer | - |
dc.title | Observational Studies in Male Elite Football: A Systematic Mixed Study Review | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 692942 | - |
dc.date.updated | 2020-03-26T13:04:51Z | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31681054 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
692942.pdf | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License