Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/154493
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPalmira, Michele-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T10:42:38Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-31T10:42:38Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn2036-6728-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/154493-
dc.description.abstractThe goal of the paper is to offer a characterisation of different ways of using the terms agreement and disagreement and to assess disagreements where subjects take themselves to instantiate the epistemic peerage relation. A distinction between merely verbal and substantive disagreement is put forth. A criticism of two popular solutions to the problem of epistemic peer disagreement is advanced-
dc.format.extent14 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUniversità della Calabria-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4396/20121207-
dc.relation.ispartofRivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 2012, vol. 6, num. 3, p. 66-79-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.4396/20121207-
dc.rightscc-by-nc (c) Palmira, Michele, 2012-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)-
dc.subject.classificationFilosofia analítica-
dc.subject.classificationFilosofia del llenguatge-
dc.subject.otherAnalysis (Philosophy)-
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy of language-
dc.titleTo agree or to agree to disagree: that is the question-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec686360-
dc.date.updated2020-03-31T10:42:38Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
686360.pdf469.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons