Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/173437
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMachlab, Salvador-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Bauer, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorLópez, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorPiqué i Clusella, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorPuig-Diví, Valentí-
dc.contributor.authorJunquera, Félix-
dc.contributor.authorLira, Alba-
dc.contributor.authorBrullet, Enric-
dc.contributor.authorSelva, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Iglesias, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorCalvet, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorCampo Fernández de los Rios, Rafael-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-28T06:49:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-05T05:10:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-05-
dc.identifier.issn0915-5635-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173437-
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: There is controversy about the length of low-residue diet (LRD) for colonoscopy preparation. The aim of the study was to compare one-day vs. three-day LRD associated to standard laxative treatment for achieving an adequate colonoscopy preparation in average risk subjects with positive fecal immunochemical test undergoing screening colonoscopy. Methods: A non-inferiority, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was performed in the setting of average risk colorectal cancer screening program. Participants were randomized to receive 1-day vs. 3-day LRD in addition to standard polyethilenglicol treatment. Adequacy of preparation was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Primary outcome was achieving a BBPS ≥ 2 in all colon segments. Analysis was performed for a non-inferiority margin of 5%, a 95% statistical power and one-sided 0.05 significance level. Results: A total of 855 patients were randomized. Adequate bowel preparation was similar between groups: 97.9% of patients in the 1-day LRD group vs 96.9% in the 3-day LRD group achieved the primary outcome (P-value for non-inferiority < 0.001). The percentage of patients with BBPS scores ≥ 8 was superior in the 1-day LRD group (254 vs 221 in the 3-day LRD group, P = 0.032). The 1-day regimen was better tolerated than the 3-day diet. 47.7% (vs 28.7%, P < 0.05) of patients rated the 1-day LRD as very easy to follow. Conclusion: The 1-day LRD is non-inferior to 3-day LRD for achieving an adequate colon cleansing before average risk screening colonoscopy and it is better tolerated. Keywords: bowel preparation; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; screening.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13860-
dc.relation.ispartofDigestive Endoscopy, 2020-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/den.13860-
dc.rights(c) Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2020-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient)-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer colorectal-
dc.subject.classificationColonoscòpia-
dc.subject.classificationDieta-
dc.subject.otherColorectal cancer-
dc.subject.otherColonoscopy-
dc.subject.otherDiet-
dc.titleComparable quality of bowel preparation with single‐day versus three‐day low‐residue diet: Randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec705581-
dc.date.updated2021-01-28T06:49:48Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
705581.pdf2.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.