Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/174217
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenavent Palomares, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorMorata, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorEscrihuela Vidal, Francesc-
dc.contributor.authorReynaga, Esteban Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorSoldevila, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorAlbiach, Laia-
dc.contributor.authorPedro Botet, Maria Luisa-
dc.contributor.authorPadullés Zamora, Ariadna-
dc.contributor.authorSoriano Viladomiu, Alex-
dc.contributor.authorMurillo Rubio, Óscar-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T14:42:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-24T14:42:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/174217-
dc.description.abstractBackground: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of tedizolid in osteoarticular infections. Methods: Multicentric retrospective study (January 2017–March 2019) of osteoarticular infection cases treated with tedizolid. Failure: clinical worsening despite antibiotic treatment or the need of suppressive treatment. Results: Cases (n = 51; 59% women, mean age of 65 years) included osteoarthritis (n = 27, 53%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 17, 33.3%), and diabetic foot infections (n = 9, 18%); where, 59% were orthopedic device-related. Most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus spp. (65%, n = 47; S. aureus, 48%). Reasons for choosing tedizolid were potential drug-drug interaction (63%) and cytopenia (55%); median treatment duration was 29 days (interquartile range -IQR- 15–44), 24% received rifampicin (600 mg once daily) concomitantly, and adverse events were scarce (n = 3). Hemoglobin and platelet count stayed stable throughout treatment (from 108.6 g/L to 116.3 g/L, p = 0.079; and 240 × 109/L to 239 × 109/L, p = 0.942, respectively), also in the subgroup of cases with cytopenia. Among device-related infections, 33% were managed with implant retention. Median follow-up was 630 days and overall cure rate 83%; among failures (n = 8), 63% were device-related infections. Conclusions: Long-term use of tedizolid was effective, showing a better safety profile with less myelotoxicity and lower drug-drug interaction than linezolid. Confirmation of these advantages could make tedizolid the oxazolidinone of choice for most of osteoarticular infections.-
dc.format.extent10 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010053-
dc.relation.ispartofAntibiotics, 2021, vol. 10, num. 1-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010053-
dc.rightscc by (c) Benavent Palomares et al., 2021-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationDiabetis-
dc.subject.classificationInteraccions dels medicaments-
dc.subject.otherDiabetes-
dc.subject.otherDrug interactions-
dc.titleLong-Term Use of Tedizolid in Osteoarticular Infections: Benefits among Oxazolidinone Drugs-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec720016-
dc.date.updated2021-02-08T10:34:17Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid33429902-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BenaventE.pdf667.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons