Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/174832
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBobillo Pérez, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorSegura Matute, Susana-
dc.contributor.authorGirona Alarcón, Mònica-
dc.contributor.authorFelipe Villalobos, Aida-
dc.contributor.authorBalaguer Gargallo, Mònica-
dc.contributor.authorHernández Platero, Lluisa-
dc.contributor.authorSolé Ribalta, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorGuitart, Carmina-
dc.contributor.authorJordán García, Iolanda-
dc.contributor.authorCambra Lasaosa, Francisco José-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T14:10:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-09T14:10:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-28-
dc.identifier.issn1472-684X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/174832-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this paper is to describe how end-of-life care is managed when life-support limitationis decided in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and to analyze the influence of the further development of the Palliative Care Unit. Methods: A 15-year retrospective study of children who died after life-support limitation was initiated in a pediatric intensive care unit. Patients were divided into two groups, pre- and post-palliative care unit development. Epidemiological and clinical data, the decision-making process, and the approach were analyzed. Data was obtained from patient medical records. Results: One hundred seventy-five patients were included. The main reason for admission was respiratory failure (86/175). A previous pathology was present in 152 patients (61/152 were neurological issues). The medical team and family participated together in the decision-making in 145 cases (82.8%). The family made the request in 10 cases (9 vs. 1, p = 0.019). Withdrawal was the main life-support limitation (113/175), followed by withholding lifesustaining treatments (37/175). Withdrawal was more frequent in the post-palliative group (57.4% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.031). In absolute numbers, respiratory support was the main type of support withdrawn. Conclusions: The main cause of life-support limitation was the unfavourable evolution of the underlying pathology. Families were involved in the decision-making process in a high percentage of the cases. The development of the Palliative Care Unit changed life-support limitation in our unit, with differences detected in the type of patient and in the strategy used. Increased confidence among intensivists when providing end-of-life care, and the availability of a Palliative Care Unit may contribute to improvements in the quality of end-of-life care.-
dc.format.extent8 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00575-4-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Palliative Care, 2020, vol. 19, num. 74-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00575-4-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Bobillo Pérez, Sara et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)-
dc.subject.classificationPediatria intensiva-
dc.subject.classificationTractament pal·liatiu-
dc.subject.classificationMortalitat infantil-
dc.subject.otherPediatric intensive care-
dc.subject.otherPalliative treatment-
dc.subject.otherInfant mortality-
dc.titleEnd-of-life care in a pediatric intensive care unit: the impact of the development of a palliative care unit-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec703227-
dc.date.updated2021-03-09T14:10:57Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid32466785-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
703227.pdf860.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons