Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/174880
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCibula, David-
dc.contributor.authorPlanchamp, François-
dc.contributor.authorFischerova, Daniela-
dc.contributor.authorFotopoulou, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorKohler, Christhardt-
dc.contributor.authorLandoni, Fabio-
dc.contributor.authorMathevet, Patrice-
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Raj-
dc.contributor.authorPonce i Sebastià, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorRaspagliesi, Francesco-
dc.contributor.authorRodolakis, Alexandros-
dc.contributor.authorTamussino, Karl-
dc.contributor.authorTaskiran, Cagatay-
dc.contributor.authorVergote, Ignace-
dc.contributor.authorWimberger, Pauline-
dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Ane Gerda Zahl-
dc.contributor.authorQuerleu, Denis-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-10T15:18:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-10T15:18:22Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01-
dc.identifier.issn1048-891X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/174880-
dc.description.abstractBackground: optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. Methods: quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives. Results: fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes. Discussion: implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.-
dc.format.extent12 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Wolters Kluwer Health-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000878-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2020, vol. 30, num. 1, p. 3-14-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000878-
dc.rightscc by (c) Cibula et al, 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia ginecològica-
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia oncològica-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de coll uterí-
dc.subject.otherGynecologic surgery-
dc.subject.otherSurgical oncology-
dc.subject.otherCervix cancer-
dc.titleEuropean Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec695270-
dc.date.updated2021-03-10T15:18:22Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid31900285-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
695270.pdf388.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons