Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/175778
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Riambau Armet, Guillem | - |
dc.contributor.author | Stillman, Steven | - |
dc.contributor.author | Boe-Gibson, Geua | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-25T16:43:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-25T16:43:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-5829 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2445/175778 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Much has been written about politicians' preferences for electoral systems, yet little is known about the preferences of voters. In 1993, New Zealand had a binding electoral referendum on the same day as the general election where voters chose between keeping a single plurality system (First Past the Post) or introducing a pure proportional one (Mixed Member Proportional). This paper merges data from all nationwide polling stations to Census data on local voters to examine what drives citizens' preferences for an electoral system. We find that strategic partisan interest was a key driver: voters overwhelmingly preferred the system that most benefited their favorite party. However, socioeconomic characteristics and social values also mattered; people who held more progressive values, were outside the dominant religion and lived in urban areas were much more likely to vote to change to a proportional system. Survey data show that these findings hold at the individual level, and further, that individuals who were angry with the economy were much more likely to vote against the status quo, regardless of their background, party preferences or social values. This behavior is likely to have ultimately balanced the result in favor of Mixed Member Proportional. | - |
dc.format.extent | 30 p. | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | - |
dc.relation.isformatof | Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00770-9 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Public Choice, 2021, vol. 186, p. 179-208 | - |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00770-9 | - |
dc.rights | (c) Springer Verlag, 2021 | - |
dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Economia) | - |
dc.subject.classification | Sociologia electoral | - |
dc.subject.classification | Referèndum | - |
dc.subject.classification | Condicions socials | - |
dc.subject.classification | Condicions econòmiques | - |
dc.subject.classification | Enquestes | - |
dc.subject.other | Voting research | - |
dc.subject.other | Referendum | - |
dc.subject.other | Social conditions | - |
dc.subject.other | Economic conditions | - |
dc.subject.other | Surveys | - |
dc.title | What determines preferences for an electoral system? Evidence from a binding referendum | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | - |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 700185 | - |
dc.date.updated | 2021-03-25T16:43:19Z | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Economia) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
700185.pdf | 5.48 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.