Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/175954
Title: Polymer-based or polymer-free stents in patients at high bleeding risk
Author: Windecker, Stephan
Latib, Azeem
Kedhi, Elvin
Kirtane, Ajay J.
Kandzari, David E.
Mehran, Roxana
Price, Matthew J.
Abizaid, Alexandre
Simon, Daniel I.
Worthley, Stephen G.
Zaman, Azfar
Hudec, Martin
Poliacikova, Petra
Abdul Ghapar, Kahar Bin
Selvaraj, Kamaraj
Petrov, Ivo
Mylotte, Darren
Pinar, Eduardo
Moreno, Raúl
Fabbiocchi, Franco
Pasupati, Sanjeevan
Kim, Hyo-Soo
Aminian, Adel
Tie, Charles
Wlodarczak, Adrian
Hur, Seung-Ho
Marx, Steven O.
Jankovic, Ivana
Brar, Sandeep
Bousquette, Lisa
Liu, Minglei
Stone, Gregg W.
ONYX ONE Investigators (Cequier, A.)
Keywords: Artèries coronàries
Efectes secundaris
Immunosupressió
Ús terapèutic
Polímers
Coronary arteries
Side effects
Immunosuppression
Therapeutic use
Polymers
Issue Date: 26-Mar-2020
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Abstract: Background: polymer-free drug-coated stents provide superior clinical outcomes to bare-metal stents in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. Data on the use of polymer-based drug-eluting stents, as compared with polymer-free drug-coated stents, in such patients are limited. Methods: in an international, randomized, single-blind trial, we compared polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents with polymer-free umirolimus-coated stents in patients at high bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was a safety composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year. The principal secondary outcome was target-lesion failure, an effectiveness composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority. Results: a total of 1996 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents (1003 patients) or polymer-free drug-coated stents (993 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 169 of 988 patients (17.1%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 164 of 969 (16.9%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). The principal secondary outcome was observed in 174 patients (17.6%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 169 (17.4%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; P = 0.007 for noninferiority). Conclusions: among patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes. (Funded by Medtronic; ONYX ONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344653.).
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa191002
It is part of: New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, vol. 382, num. 13, p. 1208-1218
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/175954
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa191002
ISSN: 0028-4793
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
706449.pdf661.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.