Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/176148
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wirth, Michael Alexander | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fischer, Gabriella | - |
dc.contributor.author | Verdú, Jorge | - |
dc.contributor.author | Reissner, Lisa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Balocco, Simone | - |
dc.contributor.author | Calcagni, Maurizio | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-09T13:48:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-09T13:48:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-8220 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2445/176148 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were recorded while performing flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation movements of their right wrist using inertial sensors and skin markers. Maximum range of motion during these trials and mean absolute difference between the systems were calculated. A difference of 10° ± 5° for flexion-extension and 2° ± 1° for radial-ulnar deviation was found between the two systems with absolute range of motion values of 126° and 50° in the respective axes. A Wilcoxon rank sum test resulted in a no statistical differences between the systems with p-values of 0.24 and 0.62. The observed results are even more precise than reports from previous studies, where differences between 14° and 27° for flexion-extension and differences between 6° and 17° for radial-ulnar deviation were found. Effortless and fast applicability, good precision, and low inter-observer variability make inertial measurement unit based systems applicable to clinical settings. | - |
dc.format.extent | 16 p. | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235297 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sensors, 2019, vol. 19, num. 23, p. 5297 | - |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235297 | - |
dc.rights | cc-by (c) Wirth, Michael Alexander et al., 2019 | - |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es | - |
dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Matemàtiques i Informàtica) | - |
dc.subject.classification | Cinemàtica | - |
dc.subject.classification | Optoelectrònica | - |
dc.subject.other | Kinematics | - |
dc.subject.other | Optoelectronics | - |
dc.title | Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 695290 | - |
dc.date.updated | 2021-04-09T13:48:27Z | - |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/811755/EU//ReHub | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31805699 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Matemàtiques i Informàtica) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
695290.pdf | 1.72 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License