Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/176375
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDávila Batista, Verónica-
dc.contributor.authorMolina de la Torre, Antonio José-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Villa, Tania-
dc.contributor.authorRomaguera, Dora-
dc.contributor.authorPérez Gómez, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorVilorio Marqués, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorDierssen Sotos, Trinidad-
dc.contributor.authorAltzibar, Jone M.-
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Aguado, Víctor-
dc.contributor.authorArdanaz, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorSalcedo Bellido, Inmaculada-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Tardón, Guillermo-
dc.contributor.authorCapelo Álvarez, Rocío-
dc.contributor.authorSalas, Dolores-
dc.contributor.authorMarcos Gragera, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorHuerta, José María-
dc.contributor.authorde Sanjosé Llongueras, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorSierra, Maria Angeles-
dc.contributor.authorCanga, Jose María-
dc.contributor.authorGómez Acebo, Inés-
dc.contributor.authorAmiano, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorPollán, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorAragonès Sanz, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorCastaño-Vinyals, Gemma-
dc.contributor.authorKogevinas, Manolis-
dc.contributor.authorMartín Sánchez, Vicente-
dc.contributor.authorMCC-Spain-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T08:44:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-16T08:44:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-03-
dc.identifier.issn2072-6643-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/176375-
dc.description.abstractBackgound: Traditional anthropometrics such as body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC) do not fully capture the complex biology of body fat (BF) in the elderly. The Clinica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) index, based on BMI, is proposed as a better indicator of BF. However, its relation with BMI is not clear. The aim was to compare the agreement between CUN-BAE, BMI, and WC in those aged ≥50 years. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 3153 Caucasian healthy adults was taken from the MCC-Spain study. The Pearson's correlation and its 95% confidence interval (CI), adiposity distribution, and Kappa Index (95%CI) were calculated. Results: The correlation of CUN-BAE with WC is 0.18 (95%CI 0.14-0.21) and that with BMI is moderate (r 0.58; 95%CI 0.55-0.60), but both increased strongly by sex. Agreement (normal weight/overweight/obesity) of CUN-BAE with BMI is 7% and with WC is 18%. Conclusions: The correlation and the degree of agreement of CUN-BAE with BMI and WC are low in individuals aged over 50, but it is higher by sex. Thus, this different criterion of obesity may have clinical applications. More studies with a gold standard are needed to evaluate the CUN-BAE in elderly adults.-
dc.format.extent12 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12040996-
dc.relation.ispartofNutrients, 2020, vol. 12, num. 4, p. 996-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu12040996-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Dávila Batista, Verónica et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationAvaluació de l'estat nutricional-
dc.subject.classificationAntropometria-
dc.subject.classificationObesitat-
dc.subject.otherNutritional status measurement-
dc.subject.otherAnthropometry-
dc.subject.otherObesity-
dc.titleThe Relation of CUN-BAE Index with Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference in Adults Aged 50 to 85 Years: The MCC-Spain Study-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec708826-
dc.date.updated2021-04-16T08:44:18Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid32260185-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
708826.pdf750.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons