Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178079
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPulido, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorVillarejo Carballido, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorRedondo Sama, Gisela-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Mengna-
dc.contributor.authorRamis Salas, Maria del Mar-
dc.contributor.authorFlecha, Ramón-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T05:48:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-08T05:48:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2014-3680-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/178079-
dc.description.abstractSince the Coronavirus health emergency was declared, many are the fake news that have circulated around this topic, including rumours, conspiracy theories and myths. According to the World Economic Forum, fake news is one of the threats in today's societies, since this type of information circulates fast and is often inaccurate and misleading. Moreover, fake-news are far more shared than evidence-based news among social media users and thus, this can potentially lead to decisions that do not consider the individual's best interest. Drawing from this evidence, the present study aims at comparing the type of Tweets and Sina Weibo posts regarding COVID-19 that contain either false or scientific veracious information. To that end 1923 messages from each social media were retrieved, classified and compared. Results show that there is more false news published and shared on Twitter than in Sina Weibo, at the same time science-based evidence is more shared on Twitter than in Weibo but less than false news. This stresses the need to find effective practices to limit the circulation of false information.-
dc.format.extent22 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherHipatia Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2020.5386-
dc.relation.ispartofRIMCIS - International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 2020, vol. 9, num. 2, p. 1-22-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2020.5386-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Pulido Rodríguez, Cristina et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Sociologia)-
dc.subject.classificationCOVID-19-
dc.subject.classificationXarxes socials-
dc.subject.classificationIncertesa (Teoria de la informació)-
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19-
dc.subject.otherSocial networks-
dc.subject.otherUncertainty (Information theory)-
dc.titleFalse news around COVID-19 circulated less on sina weibo than on twitter. How to overcome false information?-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec701817-
dc.date.updated2021-06-08T05:48:36Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Sociologia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
701817.pdf523.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons