Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178508
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcMurray, John J.V.-
dc.contributor.authorPacker, Milton-
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Akshay S.-
dc.contributor.authorGong, Jianjian-
dc.contributor.authorLefkowitz, Martin P.-
dc.contributor.authorRizkala, Adel R.-
dc.contributor.authorRouleau, Jean L.-
dc.contributor.authorShi, Victor C.-
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Scott D.-
dc.contributor.authorSwedberg, Karl-
dc.contributor.authorZile, Michael R.-
dc.contributor.authorComín Colet, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorPARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T15:33:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-17T15:33:43Z-
dc.date.issued2014-09-11-
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/178508-
dc.description.abstractBackground: we compared the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 with enalapril in patients who had heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. In previous studies, enalapril improved survival in such patients. Methods: in this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 8442 patients with class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less to receive either LCZ696 (at a dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure, but the trial was designed to detect a difference in the rates of death from cardiovascular causes. Results: the trial was stopped early, according to prespecified rules, after a median follow-up of 27 months, because the boundary for an overwhelming benefit with LCZ696 had been crossed. At the time of study closure, the primary outcome had occurred in 914 patients (21.8%) in the LCZ696 group and 1117 patients (26.5%) in the enalapril group (hazard ratio in the LCZ696 group, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.87; P<0.001). A total of 711 patients (17.0%) receiving LCZ696 and 835 patients (19.8%) receiving enalapril died (hazard ratio for death from any cause, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93; P<0.001); of these patients, 558 (13.3%) and 693 (16.5%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.89; P<0.001). As compared with enalapril, LCZ696 also reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure by 21% (P<0.001) and decreased the symptoms and physical limitations of heart failure (P=0.001). The LCZ696 group had higher proportions of patients with hypotension and nonserious angioedema but lower proportions with renal impairment, hyperkalemia, and cough than the enalapril group. Conclusions: LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and of hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by Novartis; PARADIGM-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01035255).-
dc.format.extent12 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409077-
dc.relation.ispartofNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014, vol. 371, num. 11, p. 993-1004-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409077-
dc.rights(c) Massachusetts Medical Society, 2014-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationAngiotensines-
dc.subject.classificationInsuficiència cardíaca-
dc.subject.classificationÚs terapèutic-
dc.subject.otherAngiotensins-
dc.subject.otherHeart failure-
dc.subject.otherTherapeutic use-
dc.titleAngiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec674831-
dc.date.updated2021-06-17T15:33:44Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid25176015-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
674831.pdf645.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.