Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178537
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVincenti, Flavio-
dc.contributor.authorRostaing, Lionel-
dc.contributor.authorGrinyó Boira, Josep M.-
dc.contributor.authorRice, Kim-
dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorGaite, Luis-
dc.contributor.authorMoal, Marie-Christine-
dc.contributor.authorMondragon-Ramírez, Guillermo A.-
dc.contributor.authorKothari, Jatin-
dc.contributor.authorPolinsky, Martin S.-
dc.contributor.authorMeier-Kriesche, Herwig-Ulf-
dc.contributor.authorMunier, Stephane-
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Christian P.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T16:18:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-17T16:18:59Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-28-
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/178537-
dc.description.abstractBackground: in previous analyses of BENEFIT, a phase 3 study, belatacept-based immunosuppression, as compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, was associated with similar patient and graft survival and significantly improved renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Here we present the final results from this study. Methods: we randomly assigned kidney-transplant recipients to a more-intensive belatacept regimen, a less-intensive belatacept regimen, or a cyclosporine regimen. Efficacy and safety outcomes for all patients who underwent randomization and transplantation were analyzed at year 7 (month 84). Results: a total of 666 participants were randomly assigned to a study group and underwent transplantation. Of the 660 patients who were treated, 153 of the 219 patients treated with the more-intensive belatacept regimen, 163 of the 226 treated with the less-intensive belatacept regimen, and 131 of the 215 treated with the cyclosporine regimen were followed for the full 84-month period; all available data were used in the analysis. A 43% reduction in the risk of death or graft loss was observed for both the more-intensive and the less-intensive belatacept regimens as compared with the cyclosporine regimen (hazard ratio with the more-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.95; P=0.02; hazard ratio with the less-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P=0.02), with equal contributions from the lower rates of death and graft loss. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased over the 7-year period with both belatacept regimens but declined with the cyclosporine regimen. The cumulative frequencies of serious adverse events at month 84 were similar across treatment groups. Conclusions: seven years after transplantation, patient and graft survival and the mean eGFR were significantly higher with belatacept (both the more-intensive regimen and the less-intensive regimen) than with cyclosporine. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256750).-
dc.format.extent11 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1506027-
dc.relation.ispartofNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016, vol. 374, num. 4, p. 333-343-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1506027-
dc.rights(c) Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationCiclosporina-
dc.subject.classificationRonyó-
dc.subject.classificationRebuig (Biologia)-
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia-
dc.subject.otherCyclosporine-
dc.subject.otherKidney-
dc.subject.otherGraft rejection-
dc.subject.otherSurgery-
dc.titleBelatacept and long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec666636-
dc.date.updated2021-06-17T16:18:59Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid26816011-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
666636.pdf626.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.