Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178639
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFernández Sojo, Jesus-
dc.contributor.authorAzqueta, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorValdivia, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorMartorell, Lluis-
dc.contributor.authorMedina Boronat, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Llonch, Nuria-
dc.contributor.authorTorrents, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorCodinach, Margarita-
dc.contributor.authorCanals, Carme-
dc.contributor.authorElorza, Izaskun-
dc.contributor.authorParody, Rocío-
dc.contributor.authorMartino, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorTrabazo, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorDíaz de Heredia, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorFerra, Christelle-
dc.contributor.authorValcárcel, David-
dc.contributor.authorLinares, Mónica-
dc.contributor.authorAncochea, Àgueda-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Rey, Enric-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Muñoz, Nadia-
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Nerea-
dc.contributor.authorCarreras, Enric-
dc.contributor.authorVilla, Juliana-
dc.contributor.authorQuerol Giner, Sergi-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:31:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:31:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/178639-
dc.description.abstractCryopreservation was recommended to ensure continuity of unrelated donor (UD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during COVID-19 pandemic. However, its impact on clinical outcomes and feasibility was not well known. We compared 32 patients who underwent UD HSCT using cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) during the COVID-19 pandemic with 32 patients who underwent UD HSCT using fresh PBSC in the previous period. Median neutrophil engraftment was 17.5 and 17.0 days with cryopreserved and fresh grafts, respectively. Non-significant delays were found in platelet recovery days (25.5 versus 19.0; P = 0.192) and full donor chimerism days (35.0 and 31.5; P = 0.872) using cryopreserved PBSC. The rate of acute graft-versus-host disease at 100 days was 41% (95% CI [21-55%]) in cryopreserved group versus 31% (95% CI [13-46%]) in fresh group (P = 0.380). One-hundred days progression-relapse free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly. During COVID-19 pandemic, six frozen UD donations were not transfused and logistical and clinical issues regarding cryopreservation procedure, packaging, and transporting appeared. In summary, UD HSCT with cryopreserved PBSC was safe during this challenging time. More efforts are needed to ensure that all frozen grafts are transplanted and cryopreservation requirements are harmonized.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Nature-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01367-x-
dc.relation.ispartofBone Marrow Transplantation, 2021-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01367-x-
dc.rights(c) Fernández Sojo et al., 2021-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationCOVID-19-
dc.subject.classificationCèl·lules mare-
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19-
dc.subject.otherStem cells-
dc.titleCryopreservation of unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cells: the right answer for transplantations during the COVID-19 pandemic?-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2021-06-25T10:07:54Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid34127808-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cryopreservation of unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cells.pdf697.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.