Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/180739
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKahan, Zsuzsanna-
dc.contributor.authorGil Gil, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Borrego, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorCiruelos, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Mateu, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorBermejo, Begoña-
dc.contributor.authorMargeli, Mireia-
dc.contributor.authorAntón, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorCasas, Maribel-
dc.contributor.authorCsöszi, Tibor-
dc.contributor.authorMurillo, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Serafín-
dc.contributor.authorCalvo, Lourdes-
dc.contributor.authorLang, Istvan-
dc.contributor.authorAlba, Emilio-
dc.contributor.authorHaba Rodriguez, Juan de la-
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez López, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorGal Yam, Einav-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Palomo, Andrés-
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Santiago, Santiago-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, César A.-
dc.contributor.authorServitja, Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorCorsaro, Massimo-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigálvarez, Graciela-
dc.contributor.authorZielinski, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorMartín, Miguel-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T12:58:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-21T12:58:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/180739-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The PEARL study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (palbociclib/ET) was not superior to capecitabine in improving progression-free survival in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors, but was better tolerated. This analysis compared patient-reported outcomes. Patients and methods: The PEARL quality of life (QoL) population comprised 537 patients, 268 randomised to palbociclib/ET (exemestane or fulvestrant) and 269 to capecitabine. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQC30 and QLQ-BR23 and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. Changes from the baseline and time to deterioration (TTD) were analysed using linear mixed-effect and stratified Cox regression models, respectively. Results: Questionnaire completion rate was high and similar between treatment arms. Significant differences were observed in the mean change in global health status (GHS)/QoL scores from the baseline to cycle 3 (2.9 for palbociclib/ET vs.-2.1 for capecitabine (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-8.6; P = 0.007). The median TTD in GHS/QoL was 8.3 months for palbociclib/ET versus 5.3 months for capecitabine (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = 0.003). Similar improvements for palbociclib/ET were also seen for other scales as physical, role, cognitive, social functioning, fatigue, nausea/vomiting and appetite loss. No differences were observed between the treatment arms in change from the baseline in any item of the EQ-5D-L3 questionnaire as per the overall index score and visual analogue scale. Conclusion: Patients receiving palbociclib/ET experienced a significant delay in deterioration of GHS/QoL and several functional and symptom scales compared with capecitabine, providing additional evidence that palbociclib/ET is better tolerated. Trial registration number: NCT02028507 (ClinTrials.gov). EudraCT study number: 2013-003170-27. 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.format.extent13 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BV-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.004-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2021, vol. 156, p. 70-82-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.004-
dc.rightscc by-nc-nd (c) Kahan, Zsuzsanna et al., 2021-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de mama-
dc.subject.classificationMenopausa-
dc.subject.classificationAssaigs clínics-
dc.subject.otherBreast cancer-
dc.subject.otherMenopause-
dc.subject.otherClinical trials-
dc.titleHealth-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2021-10-21T10:09:45Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid34425406-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons