Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/181223
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPla Farnós, Maria Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Montolí, Maria Eulalia-
dc.contributor.authorPascal Capdevila, Rosalía-
dc.contributor.authorCampos Delgado, Míriam-
dc.contributor.authorBajén Lázaro, Ma. Teresa-
dc.contributor.authorPetit Montserrat, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Martínez, Raul-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pérez, Evelyn-
dc.contributor.authorPernas, Sònia-
dc.contributor.authorPonce Sebastià, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Tejedor, Amparo-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T18:06:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-11T18:06:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-15-
dc.identifier.issn0392-2936-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/181223-
dc.description.abstractAxillary lymph node involvement is still an important predictor of recurrence and survival in breast cancer. Axillary staging was classically done by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), but the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has led to a progressive and continuing de-escalation in its use. Therefore, SLNB can now be considered the standard procedure for axillary staging in clinically N0 patients. Different studies have also begun to report that a positive sentinel node does not always require ALND, reducing the morbidity derived from this technique. Fears that this sentinel node approach might not be accurate for neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been allayed by several studies showing that post-neoadjuvant SLNB in clinical N0 patients reduces the rate of ALND. This approach benefits from axillary pathological complete response with an acceptable false-negative rate. By contrast, however, cN1 disease still requires that we optimise the technique to reduce the rate of false negatives. Currently, SLNB is the best method for axillary staging in breast cancer, allowing patients to be treated according to risk of recurrence, and with good evidence that morbidity is lower than with other more radical techniques.-
dc.format.extent14 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherInnovative Medical Research Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ejgo4205147-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2021, vol. 42, num. 5, p. 982-995-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.31083/j.ejgo4205147-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Pla Farnós, Maria Jesús et al., 2021-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de mama-
dc.subject.classificationBiòpsia-
dc.subject.otherBreast cancer-
dc.subject.otherBiopsy-
dc.titleRole of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: a review-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec715619-
dc.date.updated2021-11-11T18:06:40Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
715619.pdf189.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons