Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/183042
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXing, Yin-
dc.contributor.authorYue, Jianping-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Zizheng-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yang-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Jia Hu-
dc.contributor.authorTravé i Herrero, Anna-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-10T07:09:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-10T07:09:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-17-
dc.identifier.issn2296-6463-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/183042-
dc.description.abstractIntegration of different models may improve the performance of landslide susceptibility assessment, but few studies have tested it. The present study aims at exploring the way to integrating different models and comparing the results among integrated and individual models. Our objective is to answer this question: Will the integrated model have higher accuracy compared with individual model? The Lvliang mountains area, a landslide-prone area in China, was taken as the study area, and ten factors were considered in the influencing factors system. Three basic machine learning models (the back propagation (BP), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) models) were integrated by an objective function where the weight coefficients among different models were computed by the gray wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm. 80 and 20% of the landslide data were randomly selected as the training and testing samples, respectively, and different landslide susceptibility maps were generated based on the GIS platform. The results illustrated that the accuracy expressed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the BP-SVM-RF integrated model was the highest (0.7898), which was better than that of the BP (0.6929), SVM (0.6582), RF (0.7258), BP-SVM (0.7360), BP-RF (0.7569), and SVM-RF models (0.7298). The experimental results authenticated the effectiveness of the BP-SVM-RF method, which can be a reliable model for the regional landslide susceptibility assessment of the study area. Moreover, the proposed procedure can be a good option to integrate different models to seek an "optimal" result. Keywords: landslide susceptibility, random forest, integrated model, causal factor, GIS-
dc.format.extent15 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.722491-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Earth Science, 2021, vol. 9, p. 1-15-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.722491-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Xing, Yin et al., 2021-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia Aplicada)-
dc.subject.classificationEsllavissades-
dc.subject.classificationAprenentatge automàtic-
dc.subject.classificationXina-
dc.subject.otherLandslides-
dc.subject.otherMachine learning-
dc.subject.otherChina-
dc.titleLarge-Scale Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using an Integrated Machine Learning Model: A Case Study in the Lvliang Mountains of China-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec716638-
dc.date.updated2022-02-10T07:09:10Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia Aplicada)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
716638.pdf4.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons