Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/183825
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPujol, Miquel-
dc.contributor.authorMiró Meda, José M.-
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Evelyn-
dc.contributor.authorAguado, José María-
dc.contributor.authorSan Juan, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorPuig Asensio, Mireia-
dc.contributor.authorPigrau, Carles-
dc.contributor.authorCalbo, Esther-
dc.contributor.authorMontejo, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Álvarez, Regino-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Pais, María Jose-
dc.contributor.authorPintado, Vicente-
dc.contributor.authorEscudero Sánchez, Rosa-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Contreras, Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorMorata, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Milagros-
dc.contributor.authorAndrés, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorPasquau, Juan-
dc.contributor.authorArenas, María del Mar-
dc.contributor.authorPadilla, Belén-
dc.contributor.authorMurillas, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorJover Sáenz, Alfredo-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Cortés, Luis Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Pardo, Graciano-
dc.contributor.authorGasch, Oriol-
dc.contributor.authorVidela, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorHereu, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorTebé, Cristian-
dc.contributor.authorPallarès, Natàlia-
dc.contributor.authorSanllorente, Mireia-
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Luzón, Ma. Ángeles (María Ángeles)-
dc.contributor.authorCàmara, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorPadullés Zamora, Ariadna-
dc.contributor.authorCuervo Requena, Guillermo-
dc.contributor.authorCarratalà, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorMRSA Bacteremia (BACSARM) Trial Investigators-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T12:02:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-07T12:02:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-29-
dc.identifier.issn1058-4838-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/183825-
dc.description.abstractBackground We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. Methods A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy. Results Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93-1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018). Conclusions Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events.-
dc.format.extent9 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1081-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Infectious Diseases, 2020, vol. 72, num. 9, p. 1517-1525-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1081-
dc.rightscc by-nc-nd (c) Pujol, Miquel et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)-
dc.subject.classificationAssaigs clínics-
dc.subject.classificationBacteris-
dc.subject.classificationAntibiòtics-
dc.subject.classificationEndocarditis-
dc.subject.classificationMalalties infeccioses-
dc.subject.otherClinical trials-
dc.subject.otherBacteria-
dc.subject.otherAntibiotics-
dc.subject.otherEndocarditis-
dc.subject.otherCommunicable diseases-
dc.titleDaptomycin plus Fosfomycin versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus 2 aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis. A Randomized Clinical Trial-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec702901-
dc.date.updated2022-03-07T12:02:01Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
702901.pdf781.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons