Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/184069
Title: Group and sex differences in social cognition in bipolar disorder, schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and healthy people
Author: Navarra Ventura, Guillem
Vicent Gil, Muriel
Serra Blasco, María
Massons, Carmen
Crosas, Josep María
Cobo, Jesús
Jubert, Abigail
Jodar, Mercè
Fernández Gonzalo, Sol
Goldberg, Ximena
Palao Vidal, Diego J.
Lahera, Guillermo
Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
Cardoner, N. (Narcís)
Keywords: Esquizofrènia
Trastorn bipolar
Gènere
Schizophrenia
Manic-depressive illness
Gender
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2021
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Abstract: Background: Impairment of social cognition is documented in bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (SCH). In healthy individuals, women perform better than men in some of its sub-domains. However, in BD and SCH the results are mixed. Our aim was to compare emotion recognition, affective Theory of Mind (ToM) and first- and second-order cognitive ToM in BD, SCH and healthy subjects, and to investigate sex-related differences. Methods: 120 patients (BD = 60, SCH = 60) and 40 healthy subjects were recruited. Emotion recognition was assessed by the Pictures of Facial Affect (POFA) test, affective ToM by the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and cognitive ToM by several false-belief stories. Group and sex differences were analyzed using parametric (POFA, RMET) and non-parametric (false-belief stories) tests. The impact of age, intelligence quotient (IQ) and clinical variables on patient performance was examined using a series of linear/logistic regressions. Results: Both groups of patients performed worse than healthy subjects on POFA, RMET and second-order falsebelief (p < 0.001), but no differences were found between them. Instead, their deficits were related to older age and/or lower IQ (p < 0.01). Subthreshold depression was associated with a 6-fold increased risk of first-order false-belief failure (p < 0.001). Sex differences were only found in healthy subjects, with women outperforming men on POFA and RMET (p ≤ 0.012), but not on first/second-order false-belief. Limitations: The cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inferences. Conclusion: BD and SCH patients had deficits in emotion recognition, affective ToM, and second-order cognitive ToM, but their performance was comparable to each other, highlighting that the differences between them may be subtler than previously thought. First-order cognitive ToM remained intact, but subthreshold depression altered their normal functioning. Our results suggest that the advantage of healthy women in the emotional and affective aspects of social cognition would not be maintained in BD and SCH.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152258
It is part of: Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2021, vol. 109, num. 152258
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/184069
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152258
ISSN: 0010-440X
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut de Neurociències (UBNeuro))
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
717055.pdf830.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons