Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/185149
Title: | Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial |
Author: | Romaguera, Rafael Salinas, Pablo Gomez-Lara, Josep Brugaletta, Salvatore Gómez Menchero, Antonio Romero, Miguel A. García-Blas, Sergio Ocaranza, Raymundo Bordes, Pascual Jimenez Kockar, Marcelo Salvatella, Neus Jiménez-Díaz, Víctor A. Alameda, Mar Trillo, Ramiro Lee, Dae Hyun Martín, Pedro López-Benito, María Freites, Alfonso Pascual-Tejerina, Virginia Hernández-Hernández, Felipe García del Blanco, Bruno Mohandes, Mohsen Bosa, Francisco Pinar, Eduardo Roura, Gerard Comín Colet, Josep Fernández-Ortiz, Antonio Macaya, Carlos Rossello, Xavier Sabaté, Manel Pocock, Stuart J. Gómez Hospital, Joan Antoni |
Keywords: | Diabetis Pròtesis de Stent Malalties coronàries Assaigs clínics Diabetes Stents (Surgery) Coronary diseases Clinical trials |
Issue Date: | 1-Apr-2022 |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
Abstract: | Aim: Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and has shown clinical benefits in diabetes. We aimed to compare Cre8 EVO stents to Resolute Onyx stents (a contemporary polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent) in patients with diabetes. Methods and results: We did an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial at 23 sites in Spain. Eligible patients had diabetes and required percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1175 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. The trial had a non-inferiority design with a 4% margin for the primary endpoint. A superiority analysis was planned if non-inferiority was confirmed. There were 106 primary events, 42 (7.2%) in the Cre8 EVO group and 64 (10.9%) in the Resolute Onyx group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.96; pnon-inferiority <0.001; psuperiority = 0.030]. Among the secondary endpoints, Cre8 EVO stents had significantly lower rate than Resolute Onyx stents of target-vessel failure (7.5% vs 11.1%, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.99; p = 0.042). Probable or definite stent thrombosis and all-cause death were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: In patients with diabetes, Cre8 EVO stents were non-inferior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to target-lesion failure composite outcome. An exploratory analysis for superiority at 1 year suggests that the Cre8 EVO stents might be superior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to the same outcome. |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab790 |
It is part of: | European Heart Journal, 2022, vol. 43, num. 13, p. 1320-1330 |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/185149 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab790 |
ISSN: | 0195-668X |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques) Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
719033.pdf | 1.3 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License