Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/187083
Title: | Electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the International GBS Outcome Study: differences in methods and reference values |
Author: | Arends, Samuel Drenthen, Judith van den Bergh, Peter Franssen, Hessel Hadden, Robert D.M. Islam, Badrul Kuwabara, Satoshi Reisin, Ricardo C. Shahrizaila, Nortina Amino, Hiroshi Antonini, Giovanni Attarian, Shahram Balducci, Claudia Barroso, Fabio Bertorini, Tulio Binda, Davide Brannagan, Thomas H. Buermann, Jan Casasnovas Pons, Carlos Cavaletti, Guido Chao, Chi-Chao Dimachkie, Mazen M. Fulgenzi, Ernesto A. Galassi, Giuliana Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, Gerardo Harbo, Thomas Hartung, Hans-Peter Hsieh, Sung-Tsang Kiers, Lynette Lehmann, Helmar C. Manganelli, Fiore Marfia, Girolama A. Mataluni, Giorgia Pardo, Julio Péréon, Yann Rajabally, Yusuf A. Santoro, Lucio Sekiguchi, Yukari Stein, Beth Stettner, Mark Uncini, Antonio Verboon, Christine Verhamme, Camiel Vytopil, Michal Waheed, Waqar Wang, Min Zivkovic, Sasha Jacobs, Bart C. Cornblath, David R. |
Keywords: | Electrodiagnòstic Malalties autoimmunitàries Assaigs clínics Electrodiagnosis Autoimmune diseases Clinical trials |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Publisher: | Elsevier B.V. |
Abstract: | Objective: To describe the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS). Methods: Prospectively collected clinical and EDx data were available in 957 IGOS patients from 115 centers. Only the first EDx study was included in the current analysis. Results: Median timing of the EDx study was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) from symptom onset. Methodology varied between centers, countries and regions. Reference values from the responding 103 centers were derived locally in 49%, from publications in 37% and from a combination of these in the remaining 15%. Amplitude measurement in the EDx studies (baseline-to-peak or peak-to-peak) differed from the way this was done in the reference values, in 22% of motor and 39% of sensory conduction. There was marked variability in both motor and sensory reference values, although only a few outliers accounted for this. Conclusions Our study showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx in GBS patients among IGOS centers across the regions. Significance Besides EDx variation in GBS patients participating in IGOS, this diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers. This underlines the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies. |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.014 |
It is part of: | Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022, vol. 138, p. 231-240 |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/187083 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.014 |
ISSN: | 1388-2457 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques) Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
721875.pdf | 550.85 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License