Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/187083
Title: Electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the International GBS Outcome Study: differences in methods and reference values
Author: Arends, Samuel
Drenthen, Judith
van den Bergh, Peter
Franssen, Hessel
Hadden, Robert D.M.
Islam, Badrul
Kuwabara, Satoshi
Reisin, Ricardo C.
Shahrizaila, Nortina
Amino, Hiroshi
Antonini, Giovanni
Attarian, Shahram
Balducci, Claudia
Barroso, Fabio
Bertorini, Tulio
Binda, Davide
Brannagan, Thomas H.
Buermann, Jan
Casasnovas Pons, Carlos
Cavaletti, Guido
Chao, Chi-Chao
Dimachkie, Mazen M.
Fulgenzi, Ernesto A.
Galassi, Giuliana
Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, Gerardo
Harbo, Thomas
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Hsieh, Sung-Tsang
Kiers, Lynette
Lehmann, Helmar C.
Manganelli, Fiore
Marfia, Girolama A.
Mataluni, Giorgia
Pardo, Julio
Péréon, Yann
Rajabally, Yusuf A.
Santoro, Lucio
Sekiguchi, Yukari
Stein, Beth
Stettner, Mark
Uncini, Antonio
Verboon, Christine
Verhamme, Camiel
Vytopil, Michal
Waheed, Waqar
Wang, Min
Zivkovic, Sasha
Jacobs, Bart C.
Cornblath, David R.
Keywords: Electrodiagnòstic
Malalties autoimmunitàries
Assaigs clínics
Electrodiagnosis
Autoimmune diseases
Clinical trials
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Abstract: Objective: To describe the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS). Methods: Prospectively collected clinical and EDx data were available in 957 IGOS patients from 115 centers. Only the first EDx study was included in the current analysis. Results: Median timing of the EDx study was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) from symptom onset. Methodology varied between centers, countries and regions. Reference values from the responding 103 centers were derived locally in 49%, from publications in 37% and from a combination of these in the remaining 15%. Amplitude measurement in the EDx studies (baseline-to-peak or peak-to-peak) differed from the way this was done in the reference values, in 22% of motor and 39% of sensory conduction. There was marked variability in both motor and sensory reference values, although only a few outliers accounted for this. Conclusions Our study showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx in GBS patients among IGOS centers across the regions. Significance Besides EDx variation in GBS patients participating in IGOS, this diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers. This underlines the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.014
It is part of: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022, vol. 138, p. 231-240
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/187083
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.014
ISSN: 1388-2457
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
721875.pdf550.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons