Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/188902
Title: | Evaluating the Potential of Polygenic Risk Score to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening |
Author: | Arnau Collell, Coral Díez Villanueva, Anna Bellosillo Paricio, Beatriz Augé Fradera, Josep Maria Muñoz, Jenifer Guinó, Elisabet Moreira Ruiz, Leticia Serradesanferm, Anna Pozo, Àngels Torà Rocamora, Isabel Bonjoch, Laia Ibañez Sanz, Gemma Obón Santacana, Mireia Moratalla Navarro, Ferran Sanz Pamplona, Rebeca Márquez Márquez, Carmen Rueda Miret, Rebeca Pérez Berbegal, Rocío Piquer Velasco, Gabriel Hernández Rodríguez, Cristina Grau, Jaume Castells Garangou, Antoni Borràs, Josep Maria Bessa i Caserras, Xavier Moreno Aguado, Víctor Castellví Bel, Sergi CRIPREV consortium |
Keywords: | Càncer colorectal Cribratge Factors de risc en les malalties Colorectal cancer Medical screening Risk factors in diseases |
Issue Date: | 5-May-2022 |
Publisher: | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) |
Abstract: | Background: Colorectal cancer has high incidence and associ-ated mortality worldwide. Screening programs are recommended for men and women over 50. Intermediate screens such as fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) select patients for colonoscopy with suboptimal sensitivity. Additional biomarkers could improve the current scenario. Methods: We included 2,893 individuals with a positive FIT test. They were classified as cases when a high-risk lesion for colorectal cancer was detected after colonoscopy, whereas the control group comprised individuals with low-risk or no lesions. 65 colorectal cancer risk genetic variants were geno-typed. Polygenic risk score (PRS) and additive models for risk prediction incorporating sex, age, FIT value, and PRS were generated. Results: Risk score was higher in cases compared with controls [per allele OR = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.06; P < 0.0001]. A 2-fold increase in colorectal cancer risk was observed for subjects in the highest decile of risk alleles (>= 65), compared with those in the first decile (<= 54; OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.59-3.12; P < 0.0001). The model combining sex, age, FIT value, and PRS reached the highest accuracy for identifying patients with a high-risk lesion [cross-validated area under the ROC curve (AUROC): 0.64; 95% CI, 0.62-0.66]. Conclusions: This is the first investigation analyzing PRS in a two-step colorectal cancer screening program. PRS could improve current colorectal cancer screening, most likely for higher at-risk subgroups. However, its capacity is limited to predict colorectal cancer risk status and should be complemented by additional biomarkers.Impact: PRS has capacity for risk stratification of colorectal cancer suggesting its potential for optimizing screening strategies alongside with other biomarkers. |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0042 |
It is part of: | Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2022, vol. 31, num. 7, p. 1305-1312 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2445/188902 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0042 |
ISSN: | 1538-7755 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer) Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques) Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License