Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/192184
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarcano, Ana Lucrecia-
dc.contributor.authorGracida, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorRoura, Gerard-
dc.contributor.authorGomez Lara, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorRomaguera, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorTeruel, Luis-
dc.contributor.authorFuentes, Lara-
dc.contributor.authorMuntané Carol, Guillem-
dc.contributor.authorMeroño, Oona-
dc.contributor.authorSosa, Silvia Gabriela-
dc.contributor.authorGómez Hospital, Joan Antoni-
dc.contributor.authorComin Colet, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorFerreiro, José Luis-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T18:31:31Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-13T18:31:31Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-22-
dc.identifier.issn2297-055X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/192184-
dc.description.abstractIntroductionPatients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have augmented platelet reactivity and diminished responsiveness to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor, a more potent P2Y(12) inhibitor, is clinically superior to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes, although its role in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) is still the subject of debate. The aim of this investigation was to compare the pharmacodynamic effectiveness of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Mediterranean DM patients with CCS.Materials and methodsIn this prospective, randomized, crossover study, patients (n = 20) were randomized (1:1) to receive, on top of aspirin therapy, either ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD)/90 mg maintenance dose (MD) b.i.d. or clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg MD o.d. for 1 week in a crossover fashion with a 2-4 week washout period between regimens. Platelet function measurements were performed at 4 timepoints in each period (baseline, 2 h and 24 h after LD, and 1 week), including light transmission aggregometry (LTA, primary endpoint), VASP assay, Multiplate and VerifyNow P2Y(12).ResultsThe ticagrelor LD achieved greater platelet inhibitory effect than clopidogrel LD, assessed with LTA (20 mu M ADP as agonist), at 2 h (34.9 & PLUSMN; 3.9% vs. 63.6 & PLUSMN; 3.9%; p < 0.001) and 24 h (39.4 & PLUSMN; 3.5% vs. 52.3 & PLUSMN; 3.8%; p = 0.014). After 1 week of therapy, platelet reactivity was again significantly inferior with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (30.7 & PLUSMN; 3.0% vs. 54.3 +/- 3.0%; p < 0.001). The results were consistent with the other platelet function assays employed.ConclusionIn Mediterranean patients with DM and CCS, ticagrelor provides a more potent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel after the LD and during the maintenance phase of therapy.-
dc.format.extent10 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1057331-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2022, vol. 9, p.1057331-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1057331-
dc.rightscc by (c) Marcano, Ana Lucrecia et al., 2022-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationMalalties coronàries-
dc.subject.classificationDiabetis-
dc.subject.classificationFarmacologia-
dc.subject.otherCoronary diseases-
dc.subject.otherDiabetes-
dc.subject.otherPharmacology-
dc.titleAntiplatelet efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Mediterranean patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic coronary syndromes: A crossover pharmacodynamic investigation-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2023-01-12T11:24:59Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid36483622-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fcvm-09-1057331.pdf1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons