Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/194033
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSoldevila Boixader, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorPérez Fernández, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Laguna, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorUçkay, Ilker-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-23T16:26:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-23T16:26:20Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-09-
dc.identifier.issn2079-6382-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/194033-
dc.description.abstractAlong with the increasing global burden of diabetes, diabetic foot infections (DFI) and diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) remain major challenges for patients and society. Despite progress in the development of prominent international guidelines, the optimal medical treatment for DFI and DFO remains unclear as to whether local antibiotics, that is, topical agents and local delivery systems, should be used alone or concomitant to conventional systemic antibiotics. To better inform clinicians in this evolving field, we performed a narrative review and summarized key relevant observational studies and clinical trials of non-prophylactic local antibiotics for the treatment of DFI and DFO, both alone and in combination with systemic antibiotics. We searched PubMed for studies published between January 2000 and October 2022, identified 388 potentially eligible records, and included 19 studies. Our findings highlight that evidence for adding local antibiotic delivery systems to standard DFO treatment remains limited. Furthermore, we found that so far, local antibiotic interventions have mainly targeted forefoot DFO, although there is marked variation in the design of the included studies. Suggestive evidence emerging from observational studies underscores that the addition of local agents to conventional systemic antibiotics might help to shorten the clinical healing time and overall recovery rates in infected diabetic foot ulcers, although the effectiveness of local antibiotics as a standalone approach remains overlooked. In conclusion, despite the heterogeneous body of evidence, the possibility that the addition of local antibiotics to conventional systemic treatment may improve outcomes in DFI and DFO cannot be ruled out. Antibiotic stewardship principles call for further research to elucidate the potential benefits of local antibiotics alone and in combination with conventional systemic antibiotics for the treatment of DFI and DFO.-
dc.format.extent15 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010124-
dc.relation.ispartofAntibiotics, 2023, vol. 12, num. 1, p. 124-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010124-
dc.rightscc by (c) Soldevila Boixader, Laura et al., 2023-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationPeu diabètic-
dc.subject.classificationComplicacions de la diabetis-
dc.subject.classificationAntibiòtics-
dc.subject.otherDiabetic foot-
dc.subject.otherDiabetes complications-
dc.subject.otherAntibiotics-
dc.titleLocal Antibiotics in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Narrative Review-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2023-02-23T14:23:15Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid36671326-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
antibiotics-12-00124.pdf648.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons