Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/195318
Title: Automatic Detection of Slow Conducting Channels during Substrate Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Arrhythmias.
Author: Alcaine, Alejandro
Jáuregui, Beatriz
Soto Iglesias, David
Acosta, Juan
Penela, Diego
Fernández Armenta, Juan
Linhart, Markus
Andreu, David
Mont Girbau, Lluís
Laguna, Pablo
Cámara, Óscar
Martínez, Juan Pablo
Berruezo, Antonio
Keywords: Arrítmia
Cicatrius
Cirurgia cardíaca
Persones de mitjana edat
Persones grans
Ablació percutània
Arrhythmia
Scars
Heart surgery
Middle aged persons
Older people
Catheter ablation
Issue Date: 29-May-2020
Publisher: Wiley Hindawi Publishing
Abstract: Background. Voltage mapping allows identifying the arrhythmogenic substrate during scar-related ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation procedures. Slow conducting channels (SCCs), defined by the presence of electrogram (EGM) signals with delayed components (EGM-DC), are responsible for sustaining VAs and constitute potential ablation targets. However, voltage mapping, as it is currently performed, is time-consuming, requiring a manual analysis of all EGMs to detect SCCs, and its accuracy is limited by electric far-field. We sought to evaluate an algorithm that automatically identifies EGM-DC, classifies mapping points, and creates new voltage maps, named "Slow Conducting Channel Maps" (SCC-Maps). Methods. Retrospective analysis of electroanatomic maps (EAM) from 20 patients (10 ischemic, 10 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy) was performed. EAM voltage maps were acquired during sinus rhythm and used for ablation. Preprocedural contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (Ce-CMR) imaging was available for the ischemic population. Three mapping modalities were analysed: (i) EAM voltage maps using standard (EAM standard) or manual (EAM screening) thresholds for defining core and border zones; (ii) SCC-Maps derived from the use of the novel SCC-Mapping algorithm that automatically identify EGM-DCs measuring the voltage of the local component; and (iii) Ce-CMR maps (when available). The ability of each mapping modality in identifying SCCs and their agreement was evaluated. Results. SCC-Maps and EAM screening identified a greater number of SCC entrances than EAM standard (3.45 ± 1.61 and 2.95 ± 2.31, resp., vs. 1.05 ± 1.10; ). SCC-Maps and EAM screening highly correlate with Ce-CMR maps in the ischemic population when compared to EAM standard (Lin's correlation = 0.628 and 0.679, resp., vs. 0.212, ). Conclusion. The SCC-Mapping algorithm allows an operator-independent analysis of EGM signals showing better identification of the arrhythmogenic substrate characteristics when compared to standard voltage EAM.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4386841
It is part of: Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2020, vol. 2020, num. , p. 4386841
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/195318
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4386841
ISSN: 0896-4327
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
708961.pdf4.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons