Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/195458
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorGil, S.-
dc.contributor.authorAzcón Bieto, Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorNogués Mestres, Salvador-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T17:58:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T17:58:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.issn0961-9534-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/195458-
dc.description.abstractIn this work, two perennial rhizomatous grasses (Arundo donax L. (giant reed; C3) and Panicum virgatum L. (switchgrass; C4)) considered as promising energy crops have been subjected to four different types of stress in two experiments: (i) both species were subjected to four salinity and water stress treatments [well-watered with non-saline solution (WW S−), low-watered with non-saline solution (WS S-), well-watered with saline solution (WW S+) and low-watered with saline solution (WS S+)]; and (ii) both species were subjected to three temperature and light treatments [ambient temperature and light (C), ambient temperature and darkness (AD) and cold temperature and darkness (CD)]. Photosynthetic and physiological parameters as well as biomass production were measured in these plants. It can be hypothesized that a higher photosynthesis rate (Asat) was be observed in switchgrass as a consequence of its C4 metabolic pathway. However, our results indicated a similar Asat at the beginning of the experiment for both species. This could be due to switchgrass being an NAD-ME C4 type whereas giant reed has been reported as a C3 species with a high photosynthetic rate. We showed that switchgrass seems to be more resistant to stresses such as water stress, salinity and cold than giant reed in our greenhouse conditions.-
dc.format.extent11 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.021-
dc.relation.ispartofBiomass & Bioenergy, 2016, vol. 85, p. 335-345-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.021-
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier Ltd, 2016-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)-
dc.subject.classificationSalinitat-
dc.subject.classificationFred-
dc.subject.classificationGramínies-
dc.subject.otherSalinity-
dc.subject.otherCold-
dc.subject.otherGrasses-
dc.titleThe Response of Arundo donax L. (C3) and Panicum virgatum (C4) to different stresses-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec660215-
dc.date.updated2023-03-17T17:58:22Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
660215.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons