Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/198343
Title: Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Invasive<i>Escherichia Coli</i>Disease in Patients Admitted in Tertiary Care Hospitals
Author: Doua, Joachim
Geurtsen, Jeroen
Rodriguez Baño, Jesus
Cornely, Oliver A.
Go, Oscar
Gomila Grange, Aina
Kirby, Andrew
Hermans, Peter
Gori, Andrea
Zuccaro, Valentina
Gravenstein, Stefan
Bonten, Marc
Poolman, Jan
Sarnecki, Michal
Keywords: Infeccions per escheríchia coli
Septicèmia
Escherichia coli infections
Septicemia
Issue Date: 27-Jan-2023
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract: Background Invasive Escherichia coli disease (IED), including bloodstream infection, sepsis, and septic shock, can lead to high hospitalization and mortality rates. This multinational study describes the clinical profile of patients with IED in tertiary care hospitals. Methods We applied clinical criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, or septic shock to patients hospitalized with culture-confirmed E coli from urine or a presumed sterile site. We assessed a proposed clinical case definition against physician diagnoses. Results Most patients with IED (N = 902) were adults aged >= 60 years (76.5%); 51.9%, 25.1%, and 23.0% of cases were community-acquired (CA), hospital-acquired (HA), and healthcare-associated (HCA), respectively. The urinary tract was the most common source of infection (52.3%). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic shock were identified in 77.4%, 65.3%, and 14.1% of patients, respectively. Patients >60 years were more likely to exhibit organ dysfunction than those <= 60 years; this trend was not observed for SIRS. The case-fatality rate (CFR) was 20.0% (60-75 years, 21.5%; >= 75 years, 22.2%), with an increase across IED acquisition settings (HA, 28.3%; HCA, 21.7%; CA, 15.2%). Noticeably, 77.8% of patients initiated antibiotic use on the day of culture sample collection. A total of 65.6% and 40.8% of E coli isolates were resistant to >= 1 agent in >= 1 or >= 2 drug class(es). A 96.1% agreement was seen between the proposed clinical case definition and physician's diagnoses of IED. Conclusions This study contributes valuable, real-world data about IED severity. An accepted case definition could promote timely and accurate diagnosis of IED and inform the development of novel preventative strategies. IED is associated with prolonged hospitalization, extensive medical resource use, and mortality. Many patients develop SIRS, sepsis, and septic shock. The main source of infection is the urinary tract. An IED clinical case definition could promote timely and accurate diagnosis.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad026
It is part of: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2023, vol. 10, num. 2
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/198343
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad026
ISSN: 2328-8957
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ofad026.pdf622.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons