Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/201623
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLledó, Gema-
dc.contributor.authorXipell, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira Gomes, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorSolé, Manel-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Herrera, Adriana-
dc.contributor.authorCervera i Segura, Ricard, 1960--
dc.contributor.authorQuintana Porras, Luis F.-
dc.contributor.authorEspinosa, Gerard-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T08:00:34Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-30T08:00:34Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-22-
dc.identifier.issn2048-8505-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/201623-
dc.description.abstractThe role of repeat kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis (LN) with renal remission is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess this role in a real-life scenario. This retrospective, single-centre study included 56 patients with LN diagnosed from 1998 to 2019, with an initial kidney biopsy (KB1) at the onset of LN and a second kidney biopsy (KB2) after achieving renal remission. A total of 51 (91.1%) patients were women with a median age of 29.9 years [interquartile range (IQR) 23.4-40.6] at the time of LN diagnosis. KB2s were performed after 41.1 months (IQR 30.1-52.5) of KB1. At the time of KB2, complete renal response was achieved in 51 (91.1%) patients. The median activity index decreased from a baseline value of 6.5 (IQR 2.8-11) to 0 (IQR 0-2) (P < .001). The chronicity index worsened from 1 (IQR 0-2) to 2 (IQR 1-3) (P = .01). In patients with proliferative/mixed forms at KB2, the chronicity index median value increased to 3 (IQR 1.5-4), as well as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy [Formula: see text]25%, from 5.4% to 13.5%. Persistent histological active LN (activity index ≥2) was present in 11 (19.6%) KB2s. There were no differences when comparing immunological parameters between both groups (activity index ≥2 versus <2) at KB2, nor in the percentage of patients who presented renal flare. Immunosuppressive treatment was withdrawn in 35 (62.5%) patients and maintained/switched in 21 (37.5%). Afterward, new renal flare occurred in 9 patients per group (25.7% and 43%, respectively), after a median time of 39 months (IQR 6.5-55) and 7 months (IQR 6-30), respectively. There was no difference in the number of patients who developed chronic kidney disease [n = 14 (25%)] according to the treatment. In conclusion, KB2 provides valuable information to guide immunosuppressive maintenance therapy.-
dc.format.extent9 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfac150-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Kidney Journal, 2022, vol. 15, num. 11, p. 2081-2088-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfac150-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad038correction
dc.rightscc-by-nc (c) Lledó, Gema et al., 2022-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)-
dc.subject.classificationMalalties del ronyó-
dc.subject.classificationMalalties autoimmunitàries-
dc.subject.classificationLupus-
dc.subject.classificationBiòpsia-
dc.subject.classificationImmunosupressió-
dc.subject.otherKidney diseases-
dc.subject.otherAutoimmune diseases-
dc.subject.otherLupus-
dc.subject.otherBiopsy-
dc.subject.otherImmunosuppression-
dc.titleKidney biopsy in lupus nephritis after achieving clinical renal remission: paving the way for renal outcome assessment.-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec731019-
dc.date.updated2023-08-30T08:00:34Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.idimarina9329721-
dc.identifier.pmid36325009original
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
original article.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
correction.pdf95.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons