Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/202060
Title: Final analysis of the phase 3 non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
Author: Usmani, Saad Z.
Nahi, Hareth
Legiec, Wojciech
Grosicki, Sebastian
Vorobyev, Vladimir
Spicka, Ivan
Hungria, Vania
Korenkova, Sibirina
Bahlis, Nizar J.
Flogegard, Max
Bladé, J. (Joan)
Moreau, Philippe
Kaiser, Martin
Iida, Shinsuke
Laubach, Jacob
Magen, Hila
Cavo, Michele
Hulin, Cyrille
White, Darrell
Stefano, Valerio de
Lantz, Kristen
O'Rourke, Lisa
Heuck, Christoph
Delioukina, Maria
Qin, Xiang
Nnane, Ivo
Qi, Ming
Mateos, María Victoria
Keywords: Administració de medicaments
Mieloma múltiple
Anticossos monoclonals
Administration of drugs
Multiple myeloma
Monoclonal antibodies
Issue Date: Oct-2022
Publisher: Ferrata Storti Foundation
Abstract: In the primary analysis of the phase III COLUMBA study, daratumumab by subcutaneous administration (DARA SC) demon-strated non-inferiority to intravenous administration (DARA IV) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report the final analysis of efficacy and safety from COLUMBA after a median of 29.3 months follow-up (additional 21.8 months after the primary analysis). In total, 522 patients were randomized (DARA SC, n=263; DARA IV, n=259). With longer follow-up, DARA SC and DARA IV continued to show consistent efficacy and maximum trough daratumumab concentration as compared with the primary analysis. The overall response rate was 43.7% for DARA SC and 39.8% for DARA IV. The maxi-mum mean (standard deviation [SD]) trough concentration (cycle 3, day 1 pre-dose) of serum DARA was 581 (SD, 315) mu g/mL for DARA SC and 496 (SD, 231) mu g/mL for DARA IV. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months for DARA SC and 6.1 months for DARA IV; median overall survival was 28.2 months and 25.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% of patients in the DARA SC group and 52.7% in the DARA IV group; the most common (>= 10%) were thrombocytopenia (DARA SC, 14.2%; DARA IV, 13.6%), anemia (13.8%; 15.1%), and neutropenia (13.1%; 7.8%). The safety profile remained consistent with the primary analysis after longer follow-up. In summary, DARA SC and DARA IV continue to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety, with a low rate of infusion-related reactions (12.7% vs. 34.5%, respectively) and shorter administration time (3-5 minutes vs. 3-7 hours) supporting DARA SC as a preferable therapeutic choice. (Clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03277105.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279459
It is part of: Haematologica, 2022, vol. 107, num. 10, p. 2408-2417
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/202060
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279459
ISSN: 1592-8721
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA_Haematologica.pdf5.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons