Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/202643
Title: A randomized control trial to assess optical coherence tomography parameters of the Xlimus drug-eluting stent: the XLIMIT trial
Author: Testa, Luca
Squillace, Mattia
Ventrella, Nicoletta
Moreno, Raul
Jiménez Valero, Santiago
Serra, Antoni
Gomez Hospital, Joan Antoni
Bellamoli, Michele
Popolo Rubbio, Antonio
Bedogni, Francesco
Keywords: Assaigs clínics
Pròtesis vasculars
Cirurgia vascular
Clinical trials
Blood vessel prosthesis
Vascular surgery
Issue Date: 6-Sep-2023
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Abstract: BackgroundThird generation drug-eluting stents (DES) potentially offer better technical performance and reduced neointimal proliferation than previous generation DES. The XLIMIT non-inferiority trial evaluated the performance of the Xlimus (a novel sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system) in terms of endothelialization and tissue healing compared to the bioresorbable polymer Synergy DES.MethodsA total of 177 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (2 Xlimus: 1 Synergy). The primary endpoints, defined as the in-stent neointimal volume weighted by the sum of the lengths of the implanted stent (ISNV) and the in-stent neointimal percent volume obstruction (%VO) were evaluated at 6-9 months by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT). Additional OCT parameters as well as clinical endpoints were also collected.ResultsMost of the patients were males (77.4%), and the mean age was 64 years. One third of the population had stable angina/silent ischemia. A total of 300 stents (237 lesions) were analyzed: 198 (152 lesions) were in the Xlimus group, and 102 (85 lesions) in the Synergy group. The ISNV in the Xlimus group was 30.7 & PLUSMN; 24.5 mm3 while in the Synergy group it was 26.5 & PLUSMN; 26.7 mm3: the difference between the two means was 0.08 (-0, 04-0, 45), p = 0.018, thus meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis. The %VO was 16.3% & PLUSMN; 10.4% and 13.3% & PLUSMN; 10.8% in the Xlimus and Synergy groups, respectively: the difference between the two means was 3.0 (-0, 06-4, 2), (p = 0.01), thus meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis. No difference was found with respect to the secondary OCT endpoints as well as for clinical endpoints.ConclusionsThe study results confirm that the biological interaction of the Xlimus and Synergy DES with the coronary artery is comparable, and that translates in very reassuring OCT parameters at follow-up: as such, the Xlimus is non-inferior to the Synergy.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199475
It is part of: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2023, vol. 10, p. 1199475
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/202643
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199475
ISSN: 2297-055X
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fcvm-10-1199475.pdf3.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons