Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/204386
Title: Parenteral Nutrition: Current Use, Complications, and Nutrition Delivery in Critically Ill Patients
Author: López Delgado, Juan Carlos
Grau Carmona, Teodoro
Mor Marco, Esther
Bordeje Laguna, Maria Luisa
Portugal Rodriguez, Esther
Lorencio Cardenas, Carol
Vera Artazcoz, Paula
Macaya Redin, Laura
Llorente Ruiz, Beatriz
Iglesias Rodriguez, Rayden
Monge Donaire, Diana
Martínez Carmona, Juan Francisco
Sánchez Ales, Laura
Sánchez Miralles, Angel
Crespo Gómez, Monica
León Cinto, Cristina
Flordelis Lasierra, Jose Luis
Servia Goixart, Lluis
ENPIC Study Investigators
Keywords: Alimentació parenteral
Malalts en estat crític
Parenteral feeding
Critically ill
Issue Date: 3-Nov-2023
Publisher: MDPI AG
Abstract: Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is needed to avoid the development of malnutrition when enteral nutrition (EN) is not possible. Our main aim was to assess the current use, complications, and nutrition delivery associated with PN administration in adult critically ill patients, especially when used early and as the initial route. We also assessed the differences between patients who received only PN and those in whom EN was initiated after PN (PN-EN). Methods: A multicenter (n = 37) prospective observational study was performed. Patient clinical characteristics, outcomes, and nutrition-related variables were recorded. Statistical differences between subgroups were analyzed accordingly. Results: From the entire population (n = 629), 186 (29.6%) patients received PN as initial nutrition therapy. Of these, 74 patients (11.7%) also received EN during their ICU stay (i.e., PNEN subgroup). PN was administered early (<48 h) in the majority of patients (75.3%; n = 140) and the mean caloric (19.94 +/- 6.72 Kcal/kg/day) and protein (1.01 +/- 0.41 g/kg/day) delivery was similar to other contemporary studies. PN showed similar nutritional delivery when compared with the enteral route. No significant complications were associated with the use of PN. Thirty-two patients (43.3%) presented with EN-related complications in the PN-EN subgroup but received a higher mean protein delivery (0.95 +/- 0.43 vs 1.17 +/- 0.36 g/kg/day; p = 0.03) compared with PN alone. Once adjusted for confounding factors, patients who received PN alone had a lower mean protein intake (hazard ratio (HR): 0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.47; p = 0.001), shorter ICU stay (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99; p = 0.008), and fewer days on mechanical ventilation (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.89; p = 0.001) compared with the PN-EN subgroup. Conclusion: The parenteral route may be safe, even when administered early, and may provide adequate nutrition delivery. Additional EN, when possible, may optimize protein requirements, especially in more severe patients who received initial PN and are expected to have longer ICU stays. NCT Registry: 03634943.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15214665
It is part of: Nutrients, 2023, vol. 15, num. 21
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/204386
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15214665
ISSN: 2072-6643
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
nutrients-15-04665.pdf906.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons