Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/206269
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBorrego Écija, Sergi-
dc.contributor.authorMontagut Colomer, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorMartín Trias, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorVaqué Alcázar, Lídia-
dc.contributor.authorIllán Gala, Ignacio-
dc.contributor.authorBalasa, Mircea-
dc.contributor.authorLladó Plarrumaní, Albert-
dc.contributor.authorCasanova Molla, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorBargalló Alabart, Núria​-
dc.contributor.authorValls Solé, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorLleó, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorBartrés Faz, David-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Valle, Raquel-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T13:11:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-24T13:11:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-30-
dc.identifier.issn1875-8908-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/206269-
dc.description.abstractPrimary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a group of neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia characterized by language deterioration. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive intervention for brain dysfunction.To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of tDCS combined with speech therapy in the three variants of PPA. We evaluate changes in fMRI activity in a subset of patients.Double-blinded, randomized, cross-over, and sham-controlled tDCS study. 15 patients with PPA were included. Each patient underwent two interventions: a) speech therapy + active tDCS and b) speech therapy + sham tDCS stimulation. A multifocal strategy with anodes placed in the left frontal and parietal regions was used to stimulate the entire language network. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing the results of two independent sets of neuropsychological assessments administered at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention. In a subsample, fMRI scanning was performed before and after each intervention.The interventions were well tolerated. Participants in both arms showed clinical improvement, but no differences were found between active and sham tDCS interventions in any of the evaluations. There were trends toward better outcomes in the active tDCS group for semantic association and reading skills. fMRI identified an activity increase in the right frontal medial cortex and the bilateral paracingulate gyrus after the active tDCS intervention.We did not find differences between active and sham tDCS stimulation in clinical scores of language function in PPA patients.-
dc.format.extent32 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherIOS PRESS-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230069-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Alzheimers Disease, 2023, vol. 93, num. 3, p. 1169-1180-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230069-
dc.rights(c) Borrego Écija, Sergi et al, 2023-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)-
dc.subject.classificationAfàsia-
dc.subject.classificationLogopèdia-
dc.subject.otherAphasia-
dc.subject.otherSpeech therapy-
dc.titleMultifocal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Does Not Provide a Clinical Benefit Over Speech Therapy-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.date.updated2024-01-22T11:39:19Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.idimarina9354700-
dc.identifier.pmid37182884-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
manuscript_tDCS_JAD_20230327.pdf746.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.