Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/206621
Title: Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review
Author: Blade, Joan
Beksac, Meral
Caers, Jo
Jurczyszyn, Artur
Lilienfeld Toal, Marie von
Moreau, Philippe
Rasche, Leo
Rosiñol, Laura
Usmani, Saad Z.
Zamagni, Elena
Richardson, Paul
Keywords: Mieloma múltiple
Tumors
Multiple myeloma
Tumors
Issue Date: 21-May-2022
Publisher: Springer Nature
Abstract: Extramedullary involvement (or extramedullary disease, EMD) represents an aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM), characterized by the ability of a clone and/or subclone to thrive and grow independent of the bone marrow microenvironment. Several different definitions of EMD have been used in the published literature. We advocate that true EMD is restricted to soft-tissue plasmacytomas that arise due to hematogenous spread and have no contact with bony structures. Typical sites of EMD vary according to the phase of MM. At diagnosis, EMD is typically found in skin and soft tissues; at relapse, typical sites involved include liver, kidneys, lymph nodes, central nervous system (CNS), breast, pleura, and pericardium. The reported incidence of EMD varies considerably, and differences in diagnostic approach between studies are likely to contribute to this variability. In patients with newly diagnosed MM, the reported incidence ranges from 0.5% to 4.8%, while in relapsed/refractory MM the reported incidence is 3.4 to 14%. Available data demonstrate that the prognosis is poor, and considerably worse than for MM without soft-tissue plasmacytomas. Among patients with plasmacytomas, those with EMD have poorer outcomes than those with paraskeletal involvement. CNS involvement is rare, but prognosis is even more dismal than for EMD in other locations, particularly if there is leptomeningeal involvement. Available data on treatment outcomes for EMD are derived almost entirely from retrospective studies. Some agents and combinations have shown a degree of efficacy but, as would be expected, this is less than in MM patients with no extramedullary involvement. The paucity of prospective studies makes it difficult to justify strong recommendations for any treatment approach. Prospective data from patients with clearly defined EMD are important for the optimal evaluation of treatment outcomes.© 2022. The Author(s).
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00643-3
It is part of: Blood Cancer Journal, 2022, vol. 12, num. 3, p. 45
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/206621
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00643-3
ISSN: 2044-5385
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma a systematic_BloodCancer.pdf726.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons