Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/209248
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorote, Juan-
dc.contributor.authorPicola, Natàlia-
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Rodríguez, Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorPaesano, Nahuel-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Plazas, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Rivero, Marta V.-
dc.contributor.authorCelma, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía de Manuel, Gemma-
dc.contributor.authorAisian, Ignacio-
dc.contributor.authorServian, Pol-
dc.contributor.authorAbascal, José M.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-26T19:49:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-26T19:49:03Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-13-
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/209248-
dc.description.abstractThe primary objective of this study was to analyse the current accuracy of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies in detecting csPCa. A secondary objective was to determine whether there are factors predicting the finding of csPCa in targeted biopsies and, if so, to explore the utility of a predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies. We analysed 2122 men with suspected PCa, serum PSA > 3 ng/mL, and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies between 2021 and 2022. CsPCa (grade group 2 or higher) was detected in 1026 men (48.4%). Discrepancies in csPCa detection in targeted and systematic biopsies were observed in 49.6%, with 13.9% of csPCa cases being detected only in systematic biopsies and 35.7% only in targeted biopsies. A predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies was developed from the independent predictors age (years), prostate volume (mL), PI-RADS score (3 to 5), mpMRI Tesla (1.5 vs. 3.0), TRUS-MRI fusion image technique (cognitive vs. software), and prostate biopsy route (transrectal vs. transperineal). The csPCa discrimination ability of targeted biopsies showed an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI 0.721-0.762). The avoidance rate of systematic prostate biopsies went from 0.5% without missing csPCa to 18.3% missing 4.6% of csPCa cases. We conclude that the csPCa diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsies is higher than that of systematic biopsies. However, a significant rate of csPCa remains detected only in systematic biopsies. A predictive model for the partial omission of systematic biopsies was developed.-
dc.format.extent12 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184543-
dc.relation.ispartofCancers, 2023, vol. 15, num. 18-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184543-
dc.rightscc by (c) Morote, Juan et al., 2023-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de pròstata-
dc.subject.classificationBiòpsia-
dc.subject.otherProstate cancer-
dc.subject.otherBiopsy-
dc.titleA Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2023-10-25T10:27:15Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid37760511-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cancers-15-04543.pdf597.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons