Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/209827
Title: | Pharmacological treatments for psychotic depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
Author: | Oliva, Vincenzo Possidente, Chiara De Prisco, Michele Fico, Giovanna Anmella, Gerard Hidalgo Mazzei, Diego Murru, Andrea Fanelli, Giuseppe Fabbri, Chiara Fornaro, Michele De Bartolomeis, Andrea Solmi, Marco Radua, Joaquim Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963- Serretti, Alessandro |
Keywords: | Depressió psíquica Medicaments Metaanàlisi Ressenyes sistemàtiques (Investigació mèdica) Antipsicòtics Antidepressius Mental depression Drugs Meta-analysis Systematic reviews (Medical research) Antipsychotic drugs Antidepressants |
Issue Date: | 1-Mar-2024 |
Publisher: | Elsevier Ltd |
Abstract: | Background: There are no recommendations based on the efficacy of specific drugs for the treatment of psychotic depression. To address this evidence gap, we did a network meta-analysis to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for psychotic depression. Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 23, 2023 for randomised controlled trials published in any language that assessed pharmacological treatments for individuals of any age with a diagnosis of a major depressive episode with psychotic features, in the context of major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder in any setting. We excluded continuation or maintenance trials. We screened the study titles and abstracts identified, and we extracted data from relevant studies after full-text review. If full data were not available, we requested data from study authors twice. We analysed treatments for individual drugs (or drug combinations) and by grouping them on the basis of mechanisms of action. The primary outcomes were response rate (ie, the proportion of participants who responded to treatment) and acceptability (ie, the proportion who discontinued treatment for any reason). We calculated risk ratios and did separate frequentist network meta-analyses by using random-effects models. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the confidence in the evidence with the Confidence-In-Network-Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023392926. |
Note: | Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00006-3 |
It is part of: | The Lancet Psychiatry, 2024, vol. 11, num.3, p. 210-220 |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/209827 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00006-3 |
ISSN: | 2215-0366 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina) Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
846678.pdf | 1.13 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License