Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/213562
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOms Sardans, Sergi-
dc.contributor.authorZardini, Elia-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T17:27:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-25T17:27:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05--
dc.identifier.issn0029-4527-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/213562-
dc.description.abstract[eng] Graham Priest has influentially claimed that the Sorites paradox is an Inclosure paradox, concluding that his favoured dialetheic solution to the Inclosure paradoxes should be extended to the Sorites paradox. We argue that, given Priest’s dialetheic solution to the Sorites paradox, the argument purporting to show that that paradox is an Inclosure is unsound, and discuss some issues surrounding this fact.-
dc.format.extent12 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUniversity of Notre Dame-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2021-0020-
dc.relation.ispartofNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2021, vol. 62, num.2, p. 201-220-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2021-0020-
dc.rights(c) University of Notre Dame, 2021-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)-
dc.subject.classificationVeritat i mentida-
dc.subject.classificationParadoxa-
dc.subject.classificationMaterialisme dialèctic-
dc.subject.otherTruthfulness and falsehood-
dc.subject.otherParadox-
dc.subject.otherDialectical materialism-
dc.titleInclosure and Intolerance-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec700756-
dc.date.updated2024-06-25T17:27:22Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
228552.pdf166.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.