Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/214061
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNadal, Ernest-
dc.contributor.authorRifi, Nada-
dc.contributor.authorKane, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorMbacke, Sokhna-
dc.contributor.authorStarkman, Lindsey-
dc.contributor.authorSuero, Beatrice-
dc.contributor.authorLe, Hannah-
dc.contributor.authorSamjoo, Imtiaz A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-01T14:13:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-01T14:13:28Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-01-
dc.identifier.issn1872-8332-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/214061-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non -small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify realworld evidence (RWE) studies and estimated the efficacy and safety of crizotinib using meta-analyses (MA) for objective response rate (ORR), real -world progression -free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Methods: We searched MEDLINE (R), Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from January 2016 to March 2023 using Ovid (R) for published single -arm or comparative RWE studies evaluating patients (N >= 20) receiving crizotinib monotherapy for aNSCLC with ROS1 gene fusion. Pooled estimates for ORR and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were derived using the metafor package in R while pooled estimates for median real -world PFS (rwPFS) and OS were derived using reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan -Meier curves. The primary analysis included all studies regardless of crizotinib line of therapy; a subgroup analysis (SA) was conducted using studies evaluating patients receiving first -line crizotinib. Results: Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were considered feasible for MA. For the primary analysis, the pooled ORR (N = 9 studies) was 70.6 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 57.0, 81.3), median rwPFS was 14.5 months (N = 11 studies), and OS was 40.2 months (N = 9 studies). In the SA, the pooled ORR (N = 4 studies) was 81.1 % (95 % CI: 76.1, 85.2) and the median rwPFS (N = 4 studies) and OS (N = 2 studies) were 18.1 and 60 months, respectively. All MAs were associated with significant heterogeneity (I2 > 25 %). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 18.7 % of patients (pooled estimate). Conclusion: The results from this study are consistent with clinical trial data and, taken collectively, supports crizotinib as a safe and effective treatment across different lines of therapy in patients with ROS1 aNSCLC in the real -world setting.-
dc.format.extent11 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BV-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107816-
dc.relation.ispartofLung Cancer, 2024, vol. 192-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107816-
dc.rightscc by (c) Nadal, Ernest et al, 2024-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de pulmó-
dc.subject.classificationGenètica mèdica-
dc.subject.otherLung cancer-
dc.subject.otherMedical genetics-
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell Lung cancer with ROS1 gene fusion: A systematic literature review and Meta-Analysis of real-world evidence-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2024-07-01T13:30:03Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid38749072-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PIIS0169500224003507.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons