Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/214340
Title: Clinical, sociodemographic and environmental predicting factors for relapse in bipolar disorder: A systematic review
Author: Giménez Palomo, Anna
Andreu, Helena
Olivier, Luis
Ochandiano, Iñaki
de Juan, Oscar
Fernández Plaza, Tábatha
Salmerón, Sergi
Bracco, Lorenzo
Colomer, Lluc
Mena, Juan Ignacio
Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
Pacchiarotti, Isabella
Keywords: Trastorn bipolar
Assistència hospitalària
Factors de risc en les malalties
Pronòstic mèdic
Manic-depressive illness
Hospital care
Risk factors in diseases
Prognosis
Issue Date: 1-Sep-2024
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Abstract: <p>Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic and recurrent illness characterized by manic, mixed or depressive episodes, alternated with periods of euthymia. Several prognostic factors are associated with higher rates of relapse, which is crucial for the identification of high-risk individuals. This study aimed at systematically reviewing the existing literature regarding the impact of sociodemographic, clinical and environmental factors, in clinical relapses, recurrences and hospitalizations due to mood episodes in BD. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane library and Web of Science) was conducted to integrate current evidence about the impact of specific risk factors in these outcomes. Results: Fifty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies were grouped by the type of factors assessed. Family and personal psychiatric history, more severe previous episodes, earlier age of onset, and history of rapid cycling are associated with clinical relapses, along with lower global functioning and cognitive impairments. Unemployment, low educational status, poorer social adjustment and life events are also associated with higher frequency of episodes, and cannabis with a higher likelihood for rehospitalization. Limitations: small sample sizes, absence of randomized clinical trials, diverse follow-up periods, lack of control for some confounding factors, heterogeneous study designs and diverse clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Although current evidence remains controversial, several factors have been associated with an impaired prognosis, which might allow clinicians to identify patients at higher risk for adverse clinical outcomes and find modifiable factors. Further research is n</p>
Note: Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.064
It is part of: Journal of Affective Disorders, 2024, vol. 360, p. 276-296
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/214340
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.064
ISSN: 0165-0327
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
861823.pdf4.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Embargat   Document embargat fins el 31-8-2025


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons