Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/216591
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGel, Enric F. (Enric Fernández)-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-19T08:45:07Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-19T08:45:07Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-21-
dc.identifier.issn0034-4125-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/216591-
dc.description.abstractRecently, in response to an article of mine, Joseph C. Schmid has argued that some traditional theistic arguments for God’s unicity are problematic in that they presuppose a controversial principle and conflict with Trinitarian theology. In this article, I answer Schmid’s concerns. I defend one of the original arguments while advancing new ones, and I vindicate my abductive argument for theism over naturalism.-
dc.format.extent16 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713-
dc.relation.ispartofReligious Studies, 2023, vol. 59, num.4, p. 836-851-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713-
dc.rightscc by (c) Gel, Enric F., 2022-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)-
dc.subject.classificationTeisme-
dc.subject.classificationNaturalisme-
dc.subject.classificationFilosofia de la religió-
dc.subject.otherTheism-
dc.subject.otherNaturalism-
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy of religion-
dc.title'There can be only one': A response to Joseph C. Schmid-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec751528-
dc.date.updated2024-11-19T08:45:07Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
870010.pdf226.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons