Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/217100
Title: EMDR therapy vs. supportive therapy as adjunctive treatment in trauma-exposed bipolar patients: A randomised controlled trial
Author: Hogg, Bridget
Radua, Joaquim
Gardoki Souto, Itxaso
Fontana McNally, Marta
Lupo, Walter
Reinares, María
Jiménez Martínez, Ester
Madre, Mercè
Blanco Presas, Laura
Cortizo, Romina
Massó Rodriguez, Anna
Castaño, Juan
Argila Plaza, Isabel
Castro Rodríguez, José Ignacio
Comes, Mercè
Macias, Cristina
Sánchez González, Roberto
Mur Milà, Estanislao
Novo, Patricia
Rosa, Adriane Ribeiro
Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
Padberg, Frank
Pérez Solà, Víctor
Valiente Gómez, Alicia
Moreno Alcázar, Ana
Amann, Benedikt L.
Keywords: Persones de mitjana edat
Psicoteràpia
Trastorn bipolar
Traumes psíquics
Assaigs clínics
Middle aged persons
Psychotherapy
Manic-depressive illness
Psychic trauma
Clinical trials
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2024
Abstract: Introduction. Patients with Bipolar Disorder (BD) are frequently exposed to traumatic events which worsen disease course, but this study is the first multicentre randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of a trauma-focused adjunctive psychotherapy in reducing BD affective relapse rates. Materials and Methods. This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 77 patients with BD and current trauma-related symptoms. Participants were randomised to either 20 sessions of traumafocused Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy for BD, or 20 sessions of supportive therapy (ST). The primary outcome was relapse rates over 24-months, and secondary outcomes were improvements in affective and trauma symptoms, general functioning, and cognitive impairment, assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 12- and 24-month follow-up. The trial was registered prior to starting enrolment in clinical trials (NCT02634372) and carried out in accordance with CONSORT guidelines. Results. There was no significant difference between treatment conditions in terms of relapse rates either with or without hospitalization. EMDR was significantly superior to ST at the 12-month follow up in terms of reducing depressive symptoms (p=0.0006, d=0.969), manic symptoms (p=0.027, d=0.513), and improving functioning (p=0.038, d=0.486). There was no significant difference in dropout between treatment arms. Conclusions. Although the primary efficacy criterion was not met in the current study, trauma-focused EMDR was superior to ST in reducing of affective symptoms and improvement of functioning, with benefits maintained at six months following the end of treatment. Both EMDR and ST reduced trauma symptoms as compared to baseline, possibly due to a shared benefit of psychotherapy. Importantly, focusing on traumatic events did not increase relapses or dropouts, suggesting psychological trauma can safely be addressed in a BD population using this protocol. 
Note: Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.11.005
It is part of: 2024, vol. 17, num.4, p. 203-214
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/217100
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.11.005
ISSN: 2950-2853
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
858591.pdf4.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons