Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/218943
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBlanca Mena, M. José-
dc.contributor.authorAlarcón Postigo, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorArnau Gras, Jaume-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Castro, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorBono Cabré, Roser-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-18T18:19:29Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-18T18:19:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.issn0212-9728-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/218943-
dc.description.abstractAdjusted F-tests have typically been proposed as an alternative to the F-statistic in repeated measures ANOVA. Despite considerable research, it remains unclear how these statistics perform under simultaneous violation of normality and sphericity. Accordingly, our aim here was to conduct a detailed examination of Type I error and power of the F-statistic and the Greenhouse-Geisser (F-GG) and Huynh-Feldt (F-HF) adjustments, manipulating the number of repeated measures (3-6), sample size (10-300), sphericity (epsilon estimator of Greenhouse-Geisser from its lower to upper limit), and distribution shape (slight to extreme deviations from normality). The findings show that the behavior of F-GG and F-HF depends on the degree of violation of both normality, sphericity, and sample size. Overall, we suggest using F-GG under violation of sphericity and slight or moderate deviations from normality in all sample size; with severe deviations from both normality and sphericity F-GG may be used with a sample size larger than 10; and with extreme deviation from both normality and sphericity this statistic may be used with a sample size larger than 30. In the event of discrepant results between F-GG and F-HF, the choice depends on the epsilon value.-
dc.format.extent15 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUniversidad de Murcia-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.594291-
dc.relation.ispartofAnales de Psicología, 2024, vol. 40, num.3, p. 466-480-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.594291-
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Universidad de Murcia, 2024-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)-
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi de variància-
dc.subject.classificationCiències socials-
dc.subject.classificationModels lineals (Estadística)-
dc.subject.otherAnalysis of variance-
dc.subject.otherSocial sciences-
dc.subject.otherLinear models (Statistics)-
dc.titleHow to proceed when both normality and sphericity are violated in the repeated measures ANOVAen
dc.title.alternativeCómo proceder cuando se violan la normalidad y la esfericidad en el ANOVA de medidas repetidases
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec741418-
dc.date.updated2025-02-18T18:19:30Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
838911.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons