Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/218943
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Blanca Mena, M. José | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alarcón Postigo, Rafael | - |
dc.contributor.author | Arnau Gras, Jaume | - |
dc.contributor.author | García Castro, Javier | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bono Cabré, Roser | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-18T18:19:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-18T18:19:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0212-9728 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/218943 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Adjusted F-tests have typically been proposed as an alternative to the F-statistic in repeated measures ANOVA. Despite considerable research, it remains unclear how these statistics perform under simultaneous violation of normality and sphericity. Accordingly, our aim here was to conduct a detailed examination of Type I error and power of the F-statistic and the Greenhouse-Geisser (F-GG) and Huynh-Feldt (F-HF) adjustments, manipulating the number of repeated measures (3-6), sample size (10-300), sphericity (epsilon estimator of Greenhouse-Geisser from its lower to upper limit), and distribution shape (slight to extreme deviations from normality). The findings show that the behavior of F-GG and F-HF depends on the degree of violation of both normality, sphericity, and sample size. Overall, we suggest using F-GG under violation of sphericity and slight or moderate deviations from normality in all sample size; with severe deviations from both normality and sphericity F-GG may be used with a sample size larger than 10; and with extreme deviation from both normality and sphericity this statistic may be used with a sample size larger than 30. In the event of discrepant results between F-GG and F-HF, the choice depends on the epsilon value. | - |
dc.format.extent | 15 p. | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Murcia | - |
dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.594291 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anales de Psicología, 2024, vol. 40, num.3, p. 466-480 | - |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.594291 | - |
dc.rights | cc-by-nc-nd (c) Universidad de Murcia, 2024 | - |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa) | - |
dc.subject.classification | Anàlisi de variància | - |
dc.subject.classification | Ciències socials | - |
dc.subject.classification | Models lineals (Estadística) | - |
dc.subject.other | Analysis of variance | - |
dc.subject.other | Social sciences | - |
dc.subject.other | Linear models (Statistics) | - |
dc.title | How to proceed when both normality and sphericity are violated in the repeated measures ANOVA | en |
dc.title.alternative | Cómo proceder cuando se violan la normalidad y la esfericidad en el ANOVA de medidas repetidas | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 741418 | - |
dc.date.updated | 2025-02-18T18:19:30Z | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
838911.pdf | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License