Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219455
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKreisler, Esther-
dc.contributor.authorPlanellas Giné, Pere-
dc.contributor.authorFernandes-Montes, Nair-
dc.contributor.authorGolda, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Gonçalves, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorElorza, Garazi-
dc.contributor.authorGil, J.-
dc.contributor.authorAbad-Camacho, Mayra Rebeca-
dc.contributor.authorCornejo Fernández, Lídia-
dc.contributor.authorMarinello, Franco-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-04T18:22:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-04T18:22:28Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-04-
dc.identifier.issn1123-6337-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/219455-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients with rectal cancer often experience adverse effects on urinary, sexual, and digestive functions. Despite recognised impacts and available treatments, they are not fully integrated into follow-up protocols, thereby hindering appropriate interventions. The aim of the study was to discern the activities conducted in our routine clinical practice outside of clinical trials. Methods: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between January 2016 and January 2020 at six tertiary Spanish hospitals. Results: A total of 787 patients were included. Two years post surgery, gastrointestinal evaluation was performed in 86% of patients. However, bowel movements per day were only recorded in 242 patients (46.4%), and the values of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) questionnaire were recorded in 106 patients (20.3%); 146 patients received a diagnosis of fecal incontinence (28.2%), while 124 patients were diagnosed with low anterior resection syndrome (23.8%). Urogenital evaluation was recorded in 21.1% of patients. Thirty-seven patients (5.1%) were detected to have urinary dysfunction, while 40 patients (5.5%) were detected to have sexual dysfunction. A total of 320 patients (43.9%) had their quality of life evaluated 2 years after surgery, and only 0.8% completed the Quality of Life questionnaire. Medication was the most used treatment for sequelae (26.9%) followed by referral to other specialists (15.1%). Conclusions: There is a significant deficit in clinical follow-ups regarding the functional assessment of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. It is crucial to implement a postoperative functional follow-up protocol and to utilize technologies such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to enhance the evaluation and treatment of these sequelae, thereby ensuring an improved quality of life for patients.-
dc.format.extent9 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Nature Switzerland-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03089-w-
dc.relation.ispartofTechniques in Coloproctology, 2025, vol. 29-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03089-w-
dc.rightscc by (c) Kreisler, Esther et al., 2025-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationIncontinència fecal-
dc.subject.classificationAdults-
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia colorectal-
dc.subject.classificationPeríode postoperatori-
dc.subject.otherFecal incontinence-
dc.subject.otherAdulthood-
dc.subject.otherColorectal surgery-
dc.subject.otherPostoperative period-
dc.titleA word of caution in the functional monitoring of patients after rectal cancer surgery: a multicentre observational study-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec757360-
dc.date.updated2025-03-04T18:22:29Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid39755841-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
890196.pdf591.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons