Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219457
Title: Homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer: Global expert consensus on testing and a comparison of companion diagnostics
Author: Quesada, Stanislas
Penault-Llorca, Frédérique
Matias-Guiu, Xavier
Banerjee, Susana
Barberis, Massimo
Coleman, Robert L.
Colombo, Nicoletta
DeFazio, Anna
McNeish, Iain A.
Nogueira-Rodrigues, Angélica
Oaknin, Ana
Pignata, Sandro
Pujade-Lauraine, Éric
Rouleau, Étienne
Ryška, Aleš
Van Der Merwe, Nerina
Van Gorp, Toon
Vergote, Ignace
Weichert, Wilko
Wu, Xiaohua
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Pujol, Pascal
Keywords: Tumors
Càncer d'ovari
Marcadors bioquímics
Tumors
Ovarian cancer
Biochemical markers
Issue Date: 17-Jan-2025
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Abstract: Background: Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are a treatment option for patients with advanced high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (OC). Recent guidelines have clarified how homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may influence treatment decision-making in this setting. As a result, numerous companion diagnostic assays (CDx) have been developed to identify HRD. However, the optimal HRD testing strategy is an area of debate. Moreover, recently published clinical and translational data may impact how HRD status may be used to identify patients likely to benefit from PARPi use. We aimed to extensively compare available HRD CDx and establish a worldwide expert consensus on HRD testing in primary and recurrent OC. Methods: A group of 99 global experts from 31 different countries was formed. Using a modified Delphi process, the experts aimed to establish consensus statements based on a systematic literature search and CDx information sought from investigators, companies and/or publications. Results: Technical information, including analytical and clinical validation, were obtained from 14 of 15 available HRD CDx (7 academic; 7 commercial). Consensus was reached on 36 statements encompassing the following topics: 1) the predictive impact of HRD status on PARPi use in primary and recurrent OC; 2) analytical and clinical validation requirements of HRD CDx; 3) resource-stratified HRD testing; and 4) how future CDx may include additional approaches to help address unmet testing needs. Conclusion: This manuscript provides detailed information on currently available HRD CDx and up-to-date guidance from global experts on HRD testing in patients with primary and recurrent OC.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115169
It is part of: European Journal of Cancer, 2025, vol. 215
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219457
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115169
ISSN: 0959-8049
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
890192.pdf651.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons